| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211 and
and
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583
4 Correspondence:
159 Animal Sciences Center, 920 E. Campus Dr. (phone: 573-882-8234; fax: 573-884-7827; E-mail:
LambersonW{at}missouri.edu).
The objective of this study was to evaluate correlated response in placental efficiency to selection for components of litter size. Fourteen generations of selection had resulted in a difference between lines of three fully formed piglets at birth. Gilts from a line selected for an index of components of litter size (S, n = 33) and a randomly selected control (C, n = 27) were observed at farrowing. At delivery, the umbilical cord of each piglet was double tagged with identically numbered mouse ear tags to allow the piglet’s weight to be matched to the corresponding placental weight. Litter size, placental weight, birth weight, and placental vascularity were recorded. Litter size was higher (12.0 ± 0.7 vs 7.9 ± 0.7) in S than in C (P < 0.001). Line differences in placental vascularity were not significant with or without adjustment for litter size (P = 0.45 and 0.39, respectively). Correlated response to selection for components of litter size resulted in a reduced birth weight (S 82.6% of C, P < 0.001) and a reduced placental weight (S 90.9% of C, P = 0.11). After adjusting for litter size, line differences in neither placental weight nor birth weight were significant (P = 0.40 and 0.07, respectively), which indicates that the reduction in birth weight was, for the most part, due to the increase in litter size. The result of the difference in the magnitude of the change for both weights was that placental efficiency, measured as the ratio of birth weight:placental weight was 0.43 higher in C (P = 0.05). Adjustment for litter size increased the difference in placental efficiency to 0.52 (P = 0.02). Since a significant difference in litter size favoring the selected line was observed, we hypothesize that this physiological response was achieved through mechanisms other than improved placental efficiency.
Key Words: Litter Size • Pigs • Placenta • Selection
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Ocak, E. Emsen, F. Koycegiz, M. Kutluca, and H. Onder Comparison of placental traits and their relation to litter size and parity weight in sheep J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3196 - 3201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Freking, K. A. Leymaster, J. L. Vallet, and R. K. Christenson Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2093 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. M. Cammack, R. L. Weaber, and W. R. Lamberson Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Cammack, and W. R. Lamberson Selection for placental efficiency in swine: Genetic parameters and trends J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.T.T.M. van Rens, G. de Koning, R. Bergsma, and T. van der Lende Preweaning piglet mortality in relation to placental efficiency J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 144 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
