HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shurson, G. C. Articles by Whitney, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shurson, G. C. Articles by Whitney, M. H.

Impact of energy intake and pregnancy status on rate and efficiency of gain and backfat changes of sows postweaning

G. C. Shurson^*,1, G. W. Libal^,2, J. Crenshaw, C. R. Hamilton^,3, R. L. Fisher^*,4, D. D. Koehler^*,5 and M. H. Whitney^*

^* Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; and Department of Animal and Range Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; and and Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105

¹ Correspondence:
E-mail:
shurs001{at}umn.edu.

A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate factors related to determining optimal feeding and management programs for increasing net returns from marketing cull sows. A total of 269 multiparous sows averaging 192 kg of body weight were weaned, moved to individual gestation crates, and assigned to one of eight treatment combinations in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial arrangement for a 42-d postweaning feeding experiment. Factors included limited (L) (1.8 kg/sow/d) or ad libitum (AL) access to feed during wk 1 postweaning, a corn–soybean meal (corn) or barley–sunflower meal (barley) diet, and pregnant or nonpregnant status. All sows were provided ad libitum access to feed from wk 2 to 6 postweaning. Gain and feed intake (FI) data were collected weekly for each sow and used to calculate gain:feed (G/F). Ultrasonic backfat (BF) data were collected on d 0, 21, and 42 postweaning. Sows on the AL treatment had greater FI (P < 0.05) but similar gain (P = 0.80) for the 42-d postweaning period compared to sows on the L treatment. Most of this response was due to lower sow body weight loss during wk 1 postweaning (P < 0.01) when sows were provided AL (-7.2 kg) vs L (-13.2 kg) access to feed. Sows fed the corn diet had higher gain (P < 0.01), improved G/F (P < 0.01), and increased BF (P < 0.01) over the 42-d feeding period than sows fed barley. The corn diet resulted in less sow BW loss (P < 0.01) during wk 1 (-8.8 kg) than the barley diet (-11.6 kg). Pregnant sows had higher gain, FI, G/F, and BF (P < 0.01) than nonpregnant sows over the 42-d feeding period. Most of this advantage occurred during wk 4 postweaning when FI and gain of nonpregnant sows was lower (P < 0.01) than for pregnant sows. An economic analysis indicated that, when cull sow prices are relatively high and feed prices are moderate to low, maintaining and managing cull sows for an additional 6 wk postweaning may be economically advantageous compared to 0 or 3 wk. Pregnant sows fed the corn diet produced the greatest economic return. These results suggest that mating sows as they return to estrus postweaning and providing ad libitum access to a corn–soybean meal diet improves growth performance and feed efficiency, and may thereby provide increased returns when marketing cull sows.

Key Words: Energy • Feed Intake • Postweaning Interval • Pregnancy • Sows

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Cole, R. N. Clark, R. W. Todd, C. R. Richardson, A. Gueye, L. W. Greene, and K. McBride Influence of dietary crude protein concentration and source on potential ammonia emissions from beef cattle manure J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 722 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]