J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorenzen, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Savell, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorenzen, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Savell, J. W.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:143-149
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Beef Customer Satisfaction: Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values1

C. L. Lorenzen2, R. K. Miller, J. F. Taylor3, T. R. Neely4, J. D. Tatum5, J. W. Wise6, M. J. Buyck7, J. O. Reagan8 and J. W. Savell9

Department of Animal Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471

9 Correspondence:
Phone: 979-845-3935; fax: 979-845-9454; E-mail:
j-savell{at}tamu.edu.

Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) values from the Beef Customer Satisfaction study are reported. Carcasses were chosen to fit into USDA quality grades of Top Choice (upper two-thirds of USDA Choice), Low Choice, High Select, and Low Select. A trained, descriptive attribute panel evaluated top loin, top sirloin, and top round steaks for muscle fiber tenderness, connective tissue amount, overall tenderness, juiciness, flavor intensity, cooked beef flavor intensity, and cooked beef fat flavor intensity. Four steaks from each of the three cuts from each carcass were assigned randomly to one of four cooking endpoint temperature treatments (60, 65, 70, or 75°C) for WBS determination. For all trained panel measures of tenderness and WBS, regardless of USDA quality grade, top loin steaks were rated higher than top sirloin steaks, which were rated higher than top round steaks (P < 0.05). There were significant interactions between USDA quality grade and cut for most of the trained sensory panel traits: USDA quality grade influenced ratings for top loin steaks more than ratings for top round steaks or top sirloin steaks. Three interactions were significant for WBS values: USDA quality grade x endpoint temperature (P = 0.02), USDA quality grade x cut (P = 0.0007), and cut x endpoint temperature (P = 0.0001). With the exception of High Select, WBS values increased (P < 0.05) for each grade with increasing endpoint temperature. Choice top loin and top round steaks had lower (P < 0.05) WBS values than Select steaks of the same cut; however, only Top Choice top sirloin steaks differed (P < 0.05) from the other USDA grades. As endpoint temperatures increased, WBS values for top sirloin steaks increased substantially compared to the other cuts. When cooked to 60°C, top sirloin steaks were closer to top loin steaks in WBS values, when cooked to 75°C, top sirloin steaks were closer to top round steaks in WBS values. Simple correlation coefficients between consumer ratings and trained sensory muscle fiber tenderness, connective tissue amount, overall tenderness, juiciness, flavor intensity, and cooked beef fat flavor were significant (P < 0.05), but values were low. While relationships exist between consumer and trained sensory measures, it is difficult to predict from objective data how consumers will rate meat at home.

Key Words: Beef • Grading • Market Research • Tenderness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Faucitano, P. Y. Chouinard, J. Fortin, I. B. Mandell, C. Lafreniere, C. L. Girard, and R. Berthiaume
Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1678 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Behrends, K. J. Goodson, M. Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, W. W. Morgan, J. O. Reagan, B. L. Gwartney, J. W. Wise, and J. W. Savell
Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 662 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. J. Platter, J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, P. L. Chapman, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith
Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2741 - 2750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.