| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* University of Nebraska, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Concord, NE 68728;
and
South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD;
and
U.S. Meat Animal Research Center,Clay Center, NE 68933; and
and
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
2 Correspondence:
Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, 57905 866 Road (phone: 402-584-2812; fax: 402-584-2859; E-mail:
tmader{at}unlnotes.unl.edu).
Eighty-four Bos taurus crossbred steers were used to investigate effects of level and duration of limit-feeding feedlot cattle in a hot environment. Pens (four/treatment) of steers (seven/pen) were fed feedlot finishing diets and randomly assigned to the following treatments: 1) restricted to approximately 75% of feed consumed when offered ad libitum for 21-d duration (RES21); 2) restricted to approximately 75% of ad libitum for 42-d duration (RES42); and 3) feed offered ad libitum (ADLIB). Tympanic temperatures (TT) were measured via thermistors placed in the ear canal and attached to data loggers. Restricting feed intake for both 21- and 42-d reduced tympanic temperature when compared with ADLIB treatment groups under hot environmental conditions. Temperature reductions exceeded 0.5°C (P < 0.05) depending on time of day. The reduced tympanic temperature is likely due to a reduction in metabolic heat load and/or a concurrent reduction in metabolic rate. Within respective periods, no differences (P > 0.05) were found among treatments for panting or bunching score. However, different proportions of cattle were found to be bunching and panting with ADLIB cattle displaying a greater number of bunched steers that were panting when compared with the other groups. When averaged across diet treatments, dark-colored cattle had the greatest percentage of cattle showing moderate to excessive panting, while light-colored cattle displayed the least panting under thermoneutral climatic conditions. Under hot (mean daily temperature-humidity index >74) conditions, dark-colored cattle tended to bunch more (P = 0.073) and pant more (P < 0.01) than light-colored cattle. Mean TT were 0.2 to 0.6°C (P < 0.05) greater for dark- vs light-colored cattle under hot conditions. Limit-feeding feedlot cattle during early summer is a successful tool for enhancing animal comfort by alleviating the combined effects of high climatic and metabolic heat load.
Key Words: Body Temperature • Feed Intake • Feedlots • Heat Stress
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. R. Jaeger, K. C. Olson, T. DelCurto, and A. Qu Case Study: Pattern of Parturition as Affected by Time of Feeding and Prediction of the Time of Day that Parturition Will Occur in Spring-Calving Beef Cows Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Gaughan, T. L. Mader, S. M. Holt, and A. Lisle A new heat load index for feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 226 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Mader and W. M. Kreikemeier Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on blood metabolites and body temperature in heifers J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 1030 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Mader, M. S. Davis, and T. Brown-Brandl Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Mader and M. S. Davis Effect of management strategies on reducing heat stress of feedlot cattle: Feed and water intake J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 3077 - 3087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. M. Kreikemeier and T. L. Mader Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on yearling feedlot heifer performance J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2481 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Davis, T. L. Mader, S. M. Holt, and A. M. Parkhurst Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: Effects on tympanic temperature,3 J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 649 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Mader Environmental stress in confined beef cattle J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E110 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
