J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sevi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taibi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sevi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taibi, L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2002. 80:2349-2361
© 2002 American Society of Animal Science

Effects of ventilation regimen on the welfare and performance of lactating ewes in summer1

A. Sevi*,2, M. Albenzio*, G. Annicchiarico{dagger}, M. Caroprese*, R. Marino* and L. Taibi{dagger}

* Istituto di Produzioni e Preparazioni Alimentari, Facoltà di Agraria di Foggia, via Napoli, 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy and and {dagger} Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, via Napoli, 71020 Segezia-Foggia, Italy

2 Correspondence:
phone: ++39-0881-589217; fax: ++39-0881-740211; E-mail:
a.sevi{at}unifg.it.

A 6-wk trial was performed with thirty-six lactating Comisana ewes during the summer of 2001. The animals were divided into three groups of 12, which were designated low (LVR), moderate (MVR), and programmed (PROGR) ventilation regimens. In LVR and MVR rooms, fans provided 10 ventilation cycles of 12.5 and 25 min/h, respectively, whereas in the PROGR room, the fan was programmed to operate at 30°C air temperature and 70% relative humidity. Mean ventilation rates were 33, 66, and 173 m3/h per ewe in LVR, MVR, and PROGR rooms. Air concentrations of microorganisms and dust and of gaseous pollutants were measured twice weekly. Respiration rate and rectal temperature were monitored throughout the trial at 1430. Behavioral traits of ewes were recorded once per week from 0930 to 1230. Cell-mediated immune response to phytohemagglutinin at d 3, 20, and 40 and humoral response to chicken egg albumin at d 11, 21, 30, and 40 were determined. At d 37, ewes were injected with 2 IU porcine ACTH/kg body weight0.75 and subjected to blood sampling for evaluation of cortisol concentrations immediately before and 1, 2, and 4 h after ACTH injection. Milk yield was recorded daily. Individual milk samples were analyzed weekly for composition and renneting parameters and fortnightly for bacteriological characteristics. Averages of temperature-humidity index values were 78.9, 76.8, and 74.5 in LVR, MVR, and PROGR rooms, respectively. The LVR and MVR treatments resulted in higher NH3 and CO2 air concentrations than PROGR treatment (P < 0.05). The LVR and MVR ewes had higher rectal temperatures than PROGR ewes (P = 0.001). LVR animals also exhibited higher idling compared to PROGR (P < 0.01) and lower feeding times than MVR (P < 0.05) and PROGR animals (P < 0.01). Ewes under the LVR treatment displayed significant lower averages of antibody titers and higher plasma cortisol levels than PROGR (P < 0.01) and MVR ewes (P < 0.05) 60 min after ACTH injection. The LVR treatment resulted in lower yields of milk (P < 0.01) and reduced feed efficiency (P < 0.01) than PROGR treatment. Results suggest that a fan-ventilated system, providing ventilation cycles during the warmest hours of the day and the night at a mean ventilation rate of 66 m3/ewe per hour, may sustain the performance and welfare in lactating ewes raised in warm climates during summer. A ventilation regimen, programmed to operate over upper critical air temperature and relative humidity, may be economically unattractive under these conditions.

Key Words: Hydrocortisone • Immune Response • Milk Yield • Sheep • Ventilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. R. Mousel, T. D. Leeds, S. N. White, and L. M. Herrmann-Hoesing
Technical Note: Comparison of traditional needle vaccination with pneumatic, needle-free vaccination for sheep
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1468 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Sevi, L. Taibi, M. Albenzio, M. Caroprese, R. Marino, and A. Muscio
Ventilation Effects on Air Quality and on the Yield and Quality of Ewe Milk in Winter
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 3881 - 3890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Animal Science.