J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crews, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crews, D. H., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, R. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2002. 80:1809-1818
© 2002 American Society of Animal Science

Genetic evaluation of carcass yield using ultrasound measures on young replacement beef cattle1

D. H. Crews, Jr. and R. A. Kemp

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1 Canada

2 Correspondence:
5403 1st Avenue South (phone: 403-317-2288; fax: 403-382-3156; E-mail:
dcrews{at}em.agr.ca).

Live weight and ultrasound measures of fat thickness and longissimus muscle area were available on 404 yearling bulls and 514 heifers, and carcass measures of weight, longissimus muscle area, and fat thickness were available on 235 steers. Breeding values were initially estimated for carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, and fat thickness using only steer carcass data. Breeding values were also estimated for weight and ultrasound muscle area and fat thickness using live animal data from bulls and heifers, with traits considered sex-specific. The combination of live animal and carcass data were also used to estimate breeding values in a full animal model. Breeding values from the carcass model were less accurate and distributed more closely around zero than those from the live data model, which could at least partially be explained by differences in relative amounts of data and in phenotypic mean and heritability. Adding live animal data to evaluation models increased the average accuracy of carcass trait breeding values 91, 75, and 51% for carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, and fat thickness, respectively. Rank correlations between breeding values estimated with carcass vs live animal data were low to moderate, ranging from 0.16 to 0.43. Significant rank changes were noted when breeding values for similar traits were estimated exclusively with live animal vs carcass data. Carcass trait breeding values estimated with both live animal and carcass data were most accurate, and rank correlations reflected the relative contribution of carcass data and their live animal indicators. The addition of live animal data to genetic evaluation of carcass traits resulted in the most significant carcass trait breeding value accuracy increases for young replacements that had not yet produced progeny with carcass data.

Key Words: Beef Cattle • Carcass Composition • Genetic Analysis • Ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
D. H. Crews Jr., E. J. Pollak, and R. L. Quaas
Evaluation of Simmental carcass EPD estimated using live and carcass data
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 661 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
D. H. Crews Jr., E. J. Pollak, R. L. Weaber, R. L. Quaas, and R. J. Lipsey
Genetic parameters for carcass traits and their live animal indicators in Simmental cattle
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2003; 81(6): 1427 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Animal Science.