J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koster, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stokka, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koster, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stokka, G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 80, Issue 6 1652-1662, Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of increasing proportion of supplemental N from urea in prepartum supplements on range beef cow performance and on forage intake and digestibility by steers fed low-quality forage

H. H. Koster, B. C. Woods, R. C. Cochran, E. S. Vanzant, E. C. Titgemeyer, D. M. Grieger, K. C. Olson and G. Stokka
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1600, USA.

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of changing the proportion of supplemental degradable intake protein (DIP) from urea on forage intake, digestion, and performance by beef cattle consuming either low-quality, tallgrass prairie forage (Exp. 1, 2, and 4) or forage sorghum hay (Exp. 3). Experiments 1, 2, and 3 were intended to have four levels of supplemental DIP from urea: 0, 20, 40, and 60%. However, refusal to consume the 60% supplement by cows grazing tallgrass prairie resulted in elimination of this treatment from Exp. 1 and 2. Levels of supplemental DIP from urea in Exp. 4 were 0, 15, 30, and 45%. Supplements contained approximately 30% CP, provided sufficient DIP to maximize digestible OM intake (DOMI) of low-quality forage diets, and were fed to cows during the prepartum period. In Exp. 1, 12 Angus x Hereford steers (average initial BW = 379) were assigned to the 0, 20, and 40% treatments. Forage OM intake, DOMI, OM, and NDF digestion were not affected by urea level. In Exp. 2, 90 pregnant, Angus x Hereford cows (average initial BW = 504 kg and body condition [BC] = 5.0) were assigned to the 0, 20, and 40% treatments. Treatment had little effect on cow BW and BC changes and calf birth weight, ADG, or weaning weight. However, pregnancy rate tended to be lowest (P = 0.13) for the greatest level of urea. In Exp. 3, 120 pregnant, crossbred beef cows (average initial BW = 498 kg and BC = 4.6) were assigned to the 0, 20, 40, and 60% treatments. Prepartum BC change tended (P = 0.08) to be quadratic (least increase for 60% treatment), although BW change was not statistically significant. Treatment effect on calf birth weight was inconsistent (cubic; P = 0.03), but calf ADG and weaning weight were not affected by treatment. Pregnancy rate was not affected by prepartum treatment. In Exp. 4, 132 pregnant, Angus x Hereford cows (average initial BW = 533 and BC = 5.3) were assigned to the 0, 15, 30, and 45% treatments. Prepartum BC loss was greatest (quadratic; P = 0.04) for the high-urea (45%) treatment, although BW loss during this period declined linearly (P < 0.01). Prepartum treatment did not affect pregnancy rate, calf birth weight, or ADG. In conclusion, when sufficient DIP was offered to prepartum cows to maximize low-quality forage DOMI, urea could replace between 20 and 40% of the DIP in a high-protein (30%) supplement without significantly altering supplement palatability or cow and calf performance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. C. Gilbery, G. P. Lardy, S. A. Soto-Navarro, M. L. Bauer, and J. S. Caton
Effects of corn condensed distillers solubles supplementation on ruminal fermentation, digestion, and in situ disappearance in steers consuming low-quality hay
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1468 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. G. Farmer, B. C. Woods, R. C. Cochran, J. S. Heldt, C. P. Mathis, K. C. Olson, E. C. Titgemeyer, and T. A. Wickersham
Effect of supplementation frequency and supplemental urea level on dormant tallgrass-prairie hay intake and digestion by beef steers and prepartum performance of beef cows grazing dormant tallgrass-prairie
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 884 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Animal Science.