J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by van Arendonk, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by van Arendonk, J. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 80, Issue 3 575-582, Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe the weight data of pigs

A. E. Huisman, R. F. Veerkamp and J. A. van Arendonk
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. abe.huisman@alg.vf.wag-ur.nl

Various random regression models have been advocated for the fitting of covariance structures. It was suggested that a spline model would fit better to weight data than a random regression model that utilizes orthogonal polynomials. The objective of this study was to investigate which kind of random regression model fits best to weight data of pigs. Two random regression models that described weight of individual pigs, one using orthogonal polynomials, and the other using splines, were compared. A comparison with a multivariate model, Akaike's information criterion, and the Bayesian-Schwarz information criterion were used to select the best model. Genetic, permanent environmental, and total variances increased with age. Heritabilities for the multivariate model ranged from 0.14 to 0.19, and for both random regression models the heritabilities were fluctuating around 0.17. Both genetic and phenotypic correlations decreased when the interval between measurements increased. The spline model needed fewer parameters than the multivariate and polynomial models. Akaike's information criterion was least for the spline model and greatest for the multivariate model. The Bayesian-Schwarz information criterion was least for the polynomial model and greatest for the multivariate model. Residuals of all models were normally distributed. Based on these results, it is concluded that random regression models provide the best fit to pig weight data.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
F. Kohn, A. R. Sharifi, S. Malovrh, and H. Simianer
Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight of the Goettingen minipig with random regression models
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2423 - 2428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. Zumbach, I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, J. Holl, W. Herring, and T. Long
Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. G. Riley, S. W. Coleman, C. C. Chase Jr., T. A. Olson, and A. C. Hammond
Genetic parameters for body weight, hip height, and the ratio of weight to hip height from random regression analyses of Brahman feedlot cattle
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 42 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. H. Oh, M. T. See, T. E. Long, and J. M. Galvin
Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe total sperm cells per ejaculate over the reproductive lifetime of boars
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 538 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. B. Edwards, R. J. Tempelman, and R. O. Bates
Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for growth and composition
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 266 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. J. C. Cantet, A. N. Birchmeier, A. W. C. Cayo, and C. Fioretti
Semiparametric animal models via penalized splines as alternatives to models with contemporary groups
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2482 - 2494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Wall, M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone
Body Trait Profiles in Holstein-Friesians Modeled Using Random Regression
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3663 - 3671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. Iwaisaki, S. Tsuruta, I. Misztal, and J. K. Bertrand
Genetic parameters estimated with multitrait and linear spline-random regression models using Gelbvieh early growth data
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 757 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. A. Aziz, S. Nishida, K. Suzuki, and A. Nishida
Estimation of direct and maternal genetic and permanent environmental effects for weights from birth to 356 days of age in a herd of Japanese Black cattle using random regression
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 519 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. M. Silvestre, F. Petim-Batista, and J. Colaco
Genetic Parameter Estimates of Portuguese Dairy Cows for Milk, Fat, and Protein Using a Spline Test-Day Model
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1225 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Hassen, D. E. Wilson, and G. H. Rouse
Estimation of genetic parameters for ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat in Angus cattle using random regression models
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Estany, D. Villalba, J. Tibau, J. Soler, D. Babot, and J. L. Noguera
Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs: I. Growth, fat deposition, and feeding behavior traits
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2556 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Animal Science.