HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Newcom, D. W. Articles by Goodwin, R. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Newcom, D. W. Articles by Goodwin, R. N.

Genetic parameters for pork carcass components¹

D. W. Newcom^*, T. J. Baas^*,2, J. W. Mabry^* and R. N. Goodwin

^* Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011 and and National Pork Board, Des Moines, IA 50306

² Correspondence:
109 Kildee Hall (phone: 515-294-6728; fax: 515-294-5698; E-mail:
tjbaas{at}iastate.edu).

Data from 456 homozygous halothane normal purebred Yorkshire, Duroc, and Other-breed pigs from two national progeny testing and genetic evaluation programs were utilized to estimate genetic parameters for carcass components in pigs. Carcass components were cut and weighed according to Institutional Meat Purchase Specifications. Primal cut weights evaluated included 401 Ham (HAM), 410 Loin (LOIN), 405 Picnic shoulder (PIC), 406 Boston Butt (BB), and 409 Belly (BELLY). Individual muscle weights included the inside (INS), outside (OUT), and knuckle (KNU) muscles of the ham, the longissimus dorsi (LD) and psoas major (TEND) of the loin, and the boneless components of both the Boston Butt (BBUTT) and picnic (BPIC). Muscle weights from each primal were summed to yield a boneless subprimal weight (BHAM, BLOIN, BSHLDR), and all boneless subprimals were summed to yield total primal boneless lean (LEAN). Heritability estimates for HAM, LOIN, and BELLY were 0.57, 0.51, and 0.51, respectively. Heritability estimates for BB and PIC were 0.09 and 0.21, respectively. Heritability estimates for the boneless components of each primal were higher than those for the intact primals. Genetic correlations for HAM, LOIN, and PIC with loin muscle area (LMA) were 0.53, 0.78, and 0.70, respectively, and -0.62, -0.51, and -0.60, respectively, with 10th rib off-midline backfat (BF10). Boneless subprimal components were highly correlated with LEAN. Gilts had heavier weights (P < 0.01) than barrows for all boneless subprimals, individual muscles, LEAN, and for all primal cuts except BELLY. Gilts also had less BF10 and more LMA (P < 0.01) than barrows. Duroc pigs had a heavier (P < 0.01) weight for HAM and PIC when compared to Yorkshires. Yorkshire pigs had more (P < 0.01) LOIN weight than did the Durocs. Results suggest primal, boneless subprimal, and individual muscle weights in pigs should respond favorably to selection.

Key Words: Carcass Composition • Genetic Parameters • Pigs

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Casey, H. S. Stern, and J. C. M. Dekkers Identification of errors and factors associated with errors in data from electronic swine feeders J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 969 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Newcom, T. J. Baas, C. R. Schwab, and K. J. Stalder Genetic and phenotypic relationships between individual subcutaneous backfat layers and percentage of longissimus intramuscular fat in Duroc swine J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 316 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. van Wijk, D. J. G. Arts, J. O. Matthews, M. Webster, B. J. Ducro, and E. F. Knol Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 324 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]