HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crews, D. H. Articles by Kemp, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crews, D. H., Jr. Articles by Kemp, R. A.

Weaning, yearling, and preharvest ultrasound measures of fat andmuscle area in steers, bulls, and heifers¹

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada

² Correspondence:
5403 1st Avenue South (phone: 403-317-2288; fax: 403-382-3156; e-mail:
dcrews{at}agr.gc.ca).

Longissimus muscle area and fat thickness were measured following weaning, at yearling, and prior to harvest using real-time ultrasound, and corresponding carcass measurements were recorded 3 to 7 d following the preharvest scan in composite steers (n = 116, 447 ± 19 d), bulls (n = 224, 521 ± 11 d), and heifers (n = 257, 532 ± 12 d). Although fat deposition was limited in bulls and heifers from weaning to yearling, coefficients of variation ranged from 8.46 to 13.46% for muscle area, and from 27.55 to 38.95% for fat thickness, indicating that significant phenotypic variance exists across genders. Residual correlations, adjusted for the effects of year of birth, gender, and age at measurement, were high and ranged from 0.79 to 0.87 among ultrasound and carcass measures of muscle area. Residual correlations among ultrasound and carcass measures of fat thickness were also high, ranging from 0.64 to 0.86. Weaning and/or yearling ultrasound muscle area yielded similarly accurate predictions of carcass muscle area. Yearling ultrasound fat thickness accounted for 13% more of the observed variance in carcass fat thickness than the weaning ultrasound measure in single-trait prediction models. When both weaning and yearling ultrasound measures were used to predict carcass fat thickness, partial R² values were 0.15 and 0.61 for weaning and yearling ultrasound fat thickness, respectively. The difference between predicted and carcass measures with respect to muscle area (fat thickness) was less than 6.45 cm² (2.5 mm) for 80.2 to 88.9% (90.3 to 95%) of animals. Preharvest ultrasound measures yielded standard errors of prediction of less than 4.95 cm² for muscle area and 1.51 mm or less for fat thickness. These results indicate that ultrasound measures taken between weaning and yearling provide accurate predictors of corresponding carcass traits in steers, bulls, and heifers.

Key Words: Accuracy • Beef Cattle • Carcass Composition • Ultrasound

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. B. Wall, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, R. G. Tait Jr., and W. D. Busby Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1621 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]