J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bellows, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bellows, R. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2000. 79:1-14
© 2000 American Society of Animal Science

Emerging technologies and concerns in the beef industry1

R. A. Bellows2

USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory and Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Cooperating, Miles City, MT 59301

2. Retired. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Rt. 1, Box 2021 (phone: 406-232-8216; fax: 406-232-8209; E-mail: bob{at}larrl.ars.usda.gov).

Abstract

Advances in the disciplines of reproduction, nutrition, genetics, plant science, product quality, and equipment have been applied by the beef industry and have resulted in improved production efficiency and greater quantity and quality of products available to the consumer. The fact that U.S. consumers spend only 11% of their total income to purchase food is testimony to the success of this technology adoption. Consumers are the ultimate benefactors of the application of technology in production, processing, and marketing of beef and all agricultural products. This fact must be considered as a strong argument for public funding for agricultural research. However, the extent of technology adoption across the beef industry, particularly in cow-calf production, is relatively low and must increase if U.S. producers are to remain competitive nationally and internationally. Future production will involve major input from animal, people, and environmental representatives and result in reduced independence of decision making by producers at all links of the production chain. Animal scientists must seize the opportunity to shoulder increased responsibility to ensure that the voice of animal agriculture is heard and remains a strong economic force.


Footnotes

1. This research was conducted under a cooperative agreement between USDA-ARS and the Montana Agric. Exp. Sta. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by USDA, Montana Agric. Exp. Sta., or the authors and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be also suitable. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Northern Plains Area, is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer and all agency services are available without discrimination.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.