J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firkins, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Noftsger, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Firkins, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Noftsger, S. M.
J. Anim. Sci. 2001. 79:E218-E238
© 2001 American Society of Animal Science

Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle1

J. L. Firkins2, M. L. Eastridge, N. R. St-Pierre and S. M. Noftsger

Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210

2 Correspondence: 223 Animal Science Building, 2029 Fyffe Road (phone: 614-688-3089; fax: 614-292-2929; E-mail: firkins.1{at}osu.edu).

Abstract

Variation in site of digestion and lactation performance among lactating dairy cows fed different grain sources was evaluated and reviewed. The enzymatic assay for starch contributes to variation among and possibly even within experiments. Genetic differences within grain source affect digestibility, but effects of grain processing are considerable. When quantifying response criteria among numerous experiments with varying experimental procedures, the variation among experiments is very high and should be considered in regressions used to evaluate treatment responses. Some of the variation among experiments could be explained by variable DMI (positive relationship with milk production and microbial N flow to the duodenum but negative relationship with milk fat percentage and ruminal digestibility of starch) and other chemical measurements of dietary composition (especially forage and NDF percentages of the diet). Other sources of variation that could not be quantified among experiments were accounted for in regression models as experiment effects. After these adjustments, least squares means were calculated as the average of all effects remaining in the models. Our results documented that processing procedures to enhance the ruminal degradability of starch generally decreased NDF digestibility by a lesser degree, partially negating responses in true ruminal OMdigestibility. However, lactating cows fed diets with low ruminal degradability of starch had higher, nearly complete compensatory digestion of starch in the hindgut, thereby resulting in relatively minor improvements in total tractOMdigestibility or lactation performance for the more highly available starch sources, assuming similar DMI. These results highlight the importance of maximization of DMI compared with grainprocessing method and the need for more production experiments comparing grain sources at similar intakes of ruminally digestible starch (i.e., lower percentages in the diet for more highly degradable starch sources) for better evaluation of overall efficacy. In particular, the long-term responses and potential for residual responses over time (i.e., treatment x time interactions) are needed. Until better mechanistic prediction of lactation response is available, the least squares means of ruminal and total tract digestibilities of nutrients should be useful for empirical formulation and evaluation of dairy rations.


Footnotes

1 Salaries and research support were provided by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State Univ. Manuscript no. 2-01AS.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. N. Gozho and T. Mutsvangwa
Influence of Carbohydrate Source on Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics, Performance, and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2726 - 2735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Firkins, B. S. Oldick, J. Pantoja, C. Reveneau, L. E. Gilligan, and L. Carver
Efficacy of Liquid Feeds Varying in Concentration and Composition of Fat, Nonprotein Nitrogen, and Nonfiber Carbohydrates for Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1969 - 1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Firkins, Z. Yu, and M. Morrison
Ruminal Nitrogen Metabolism: Perspectives for Integration of Microbiology and Nutrition for Dairy
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(13_suppl): E1 - E16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. E. Foley, A. N. Hristov, A. Melgar, J. K. Ropp, R. P. Etter, S. Zaman, C. W. Hunt, K. Huber, and W. J. Price
Effect of barley and its amylopectin content on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4321 - 4335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. P. Weiss and D. J. Wyatt
Effect of Corn Silage Hybrid and Metabolizable Protein Supply on Nitrogen Metabolism of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1644 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. L. Eastridge
Major advances in applied dairy cattle nutrition.
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1311 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Firkins, A. N. Hristov, M. B. Hall, G. A. Varga, and N. R. St-Pierre
Integration of Ruminal Metabolism in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E31 - E51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii
A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Intake of Nutrients and Body Weight with Milk Volume and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2860 - 2869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Beckman and W. P. Weiss
Nutrient Digestibility of Diets with Different Fiber to Starch Ratios when Fed to Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1015 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. K. Ivan, R. J. Grant, D. Weakley, and J. Beck
Comparison of a Corn Silage Hybrid with High Cell-Wall Content and Digestibility with a Hybrid of Lower Cell-Wall Content on Performance of Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 244 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii
A Meta-Analysis Examining the Relationship Among Dietary Factors, Dry Matter Intake, and Milk and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2184 - 2196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. C. Stone
Nutritional Approaches to Minimize Subacute Ruminal Acidosis and Laminitis in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E13 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. M. Krause, D. K. Combs, and K. A. Beauchemin
Effects of Increasing Levels of Refined Cornstarch in the Diet of Lactating Dairy Cows on Performance and Ruminal pH
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1341 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. I. Harvatine, J. L. Firkins, and M. L. Eastridge
Whole Linted Cottonseed as a Forage Substitute Fed with Ground or Steam-flaked Corn: Digestibility and Performance
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2002; 85(8): 1976 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Animal Science.