|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 9 2286-2297, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
A. Ruiz-Flores and R. K. Johnson
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.
Our objectives were to estimate responses and genetic parameters for ovulation rate, number of fully formed pigs at birth, and other production traits following two-stage selection for increased ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs. Eight generations of selection were practiced in each of two lines. One selection line was derived from a line that previously selected eight generations for an index to increase ovulation rate and embryonic survival (the IOL pigs). The other selection line was derived from the unselected control line of the index selection experiment (the COL pigs). The control line (C) was continued with random selection. Due to previous selection, Line IOL had greater ovulation rate (4.24 +/- 0.38 and 4.14 +/- 0.29 ova) and litter size (1.97 +/- 0.39 and 1.06 +/- 0.38 pigs) at Generation 0 of two-stage selection than did Lines COL and C. In Stage 1, all gilts from 50% of the largest litters were retained. Approximately 50% of them were selected for ovulation rate in Stage 2. Gilts selected for ovulation rate were mated to boars selected from the upper one-third of the litters for litter size. At Generations 7 and 8, differences in mean EBV for ovulation rate and litter size between Lines IOL and C were 6.20 +/- 0.29 ova and 4.66 +/- 0.38 pigs; differences between Lines COL and C were 2.26 +/- 0.29 ova and 2.79 +/- 0.39 pigs; and differences between Lines IOL and COL were 3.94 +/- 0.26 ova and 1.86 +/- 0.39 pigs. Regressions of line mean EBV on generation number were 0.27 +/- 0.07 ova and 0.35 +/- 0.06 pigs in Line IOL; 0.30 +/- 0.06 ova and 0.29 +/- 0.05 pigs in Line COL; and 0.01 +/- 0.07 ova and 0.02 +/- 0.05 pigs in Line C. Correlated responses were decreased age at puberty and increased number of pigs born alive, number of mummified pigs, prenatal loss, and individual and litter birth weight. Two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of pigs per litter is a promising procedure to improve litter size in swine.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Rosendo, L. Canario, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3209 - 3217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, L. Canario, and J. P. Bidanel Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1615 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Cammack, and W. R. Lamberson Selection for placental efficiency in swine: Genetic parameters and trends J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Holl and R. K. Johnson Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 34 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Petry, J. W. Holl, and R. K. Johnson Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 1895 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Ford, T. H. Wise, and R. K. Christenson Lack of an association between plasma follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations and ovarian weight in prepubertal gilts J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 472 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Gladney, G. R. Bertani, R. K. Johnson, and D. Pomp Evaluation of gene expression in pigs selected for enhanced reproduction using differential display PCR and human microarrays: I. Ovarian follicles J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Moeller, R. N. Goodwin, R. K. Johnson, J. W. Mabry, T. J. Baas, and O. W. Robison The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: A comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 41 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |