J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiegand, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baas, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiegand, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baas, T. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 8 2187-2195, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Conjugated linoleic acid improves feed efficiency, decreases subcutaneous fat, and improves certain aspects of meat quality in stress-genotype pigs

B. R. Wiegand, F. C. Parrish Jr, J. E. Swan, S. T. Larsen and T. J. Baas
Meat Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) was supplemented to crossbred growing-finishing barrows (n = 60) at 0.75% of the total diet. Pigs were randomly assigned to the CLA or control diets based on stress genotype (negative, carrier, or positive). Gain:feed was higher for CLA diet animals (350 g/kg feed) than for control diet animals (330 g/kg feed) independent of genotype (P < 0.05). No differences were observed for ADG for the diets (P = 0.71) or genotype classes (P = 0.40). Postmortem pH was lower (P < 0.01) by 3 h for CLA-supplemented pigs, with no differences in ultimate pH. No differences (P = 0.16) were observed for ultimate pH between the three genotypes. Conjugated linoleic acid-supplemented pigs exhibited less 10th rib fat depth (2.34 cm vs 2.84 cm) and last rib fat depth (2.46 cm vs 2.72 cm) than control pigs (P < 0.05). Loin muscle area (LMA) was not affected (P = 0.18) by CLA supplementation, but LMA was different (P < 0.02) for genotype; positive genotype carcasses had the largest LMA (45.02 cm2) and negative carcasses had the smallest LMA (36.44 cm2). Carrier carcasses were intermediate for LMA (40.76 cm2). Subjective scores for color were not affected (P = 0.98) by CLA but color was different (P < 0.01), with scores of 1.50, 2.40, and 3.1 for positive, carrier, and negative genotypes, respectively. Subjective marbling scores were increased (P < 0.03) in all genotypes with CLA supplementation. Subjective firmness scores were higher (P < 0.06) for CLA-supplemented pigs and were highly correlated (0.89) to marbling scores. The L* values were higher (P < 0.01) for stress-positive pigs at 24 h postmortem. Also, L* values were higher (P < 0.01) for CLA-fed pigs over 7 d of shelf storage. Sensory characteristics were not different with CLA supplementation for tenderness (P = 0.24), juiciness (P = 0.35), or flavor intensity (P = 0.14). This study showed that LMA was increased with stress-carrier and stress-positive genotypes, but lean color was negatively affected with the presence of the stress gene. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation improves feed efficiency, decreases backfat, and improves pork quality attributes of marbling and firmness of the longissimus muscle. Furthermore, there is seemingly no interaction between the stress-genotype status of pigs and the subsequent effect of CLA on their growth and performance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. J. Hausman, S. P. Poulos, T. D. Pringle, and M. J. Azain
The influence of thiazolidinediones on adipogenesis in vitro and in vivo: Potential modifiers of intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in meat animals
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E236 - E243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Averette Gatlin, M. T. See, D. K. Larick, and J. Odle
Descriptive flavor analysis of bacon and pork loin from lean-genotype gilts fed conjugated linoleic acid and supplemental fat
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3381 - 3386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. E. Dugan, J. L Aalhus, and J. K. Kramer
Conjugated linoleic acid pork research
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 1212S - 1216S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. H. Gillis, S. K. Duckett, J. R. Sackmann, C. E. Realini, D. H. Keisler, and T. D. Pringle
Effects of supplemental rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid or linoleic acid on feedlot performance, carcass quality, and leptin concentrations in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 851 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. A. Gatlin, M. T. See, D. K. Larick, X. Lin, and J. Odle
Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Combination with Supplemental Dietary Fat Alters Pork Fat Quality
J. Nutr., October 1, 2002; 132(10): 3105 - 3112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. B. Smith, T. S. Hively, G. M. Cortese, J. J. Han, K. Y. Chung, P. Castenada, C. D. Gilbert, V. L. Adams, and H. J. Mersmann
Conjugated linoleic acid depresses the {delta}9 desaturase index and stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase enzyme activity in porcine subcutaneous adipose tissue
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2110 - 2115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Animal Science.