J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guiroy, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cravey, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guiroy, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cravey, M. D.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 8 1983-1995, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Predicting individual feed requirements of cattle fed in groups

P. J. Guiroy, D. G. Fox, L. O. Tedeschi, M. J. Baker and M. D. Cravey
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. pjg13@cornell.edu

A published model designed to predict individual feed required for the observed shrunk BW and ADG of growing cattle when fed in groups was modified and evaluated to improve its accuracy. This model is needed to accurately bill feed and compute cost of gain in marketing programs based on individual animal management. Because of its importance in predicting energy required for growth, a database of 401 steers was used to develop an equation to predict percentage of empty-body fat (EBF) from carcass measurements (12th rib fat thickness, hot carcass weight, USDA quality grade, and longissimus muscle area), which accounted for 61% of the variation in EBF with no bias (P > 0.1). When tested with an independent data set of 951 steers, the equation accounted for 51% of the variation with 1% proportional bias. The large variation in the carcass measurements at a particular EBF observed in this study indicates further improvement is limited by the inability of carcass measurements to account for variation in fat distribution in the various carcass components. Because of its importance in setting the target end point, a database of 1,355 steers and heifers was used to determine the relationship between EBF and USDA quality grade. These data indicate growing and finishing cattle reach Select and low-Choice quality grades at an EBF of 26.15 +/- 0.19 and 28.61 +/- 0.20%, respectively (P < 0.05). A data set of 228 steers from different breeds from two serial slaughter studies indicated 14.26 +/- 1.52 kg of empty BW change are required to increase EBF one percentage unit for cattle fed high-energy diets; this adjustment is needed to adjust final shrunk BW to the target EBF end point. The model to predict DM required with modifications developed in this study was evaluated with data from 365 individually fed cattle and it accounted for 74% of the variation in observed DM consumed with no bias (P > 0.1). When the revised model was applied to a commercial feedlot data set containing 12,105 steers and heifers, the total observed DM consumed was predicted with a bias of less than 1%. The model presented in this study accounts for differences known to affect animal requirements (breed type, BW and ADG, and weight at the target EBF end point) and can be used to fairly allocate feed to individuals fed in a group under commercial feedlot conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
L. F. Romero, M. J. Zuidhof, R. A. Renema, F. E. Robinson, and A. Naeima
Nonlinear mixed models to study metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder hens
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2009; 88(6): 1310 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Leheska, J. L. Montgomery, C. R. Krehbiel, D. A. Yates, J. P. Hutcheson, W. T. Nichols, M. Streeter, J. R. Blanton Jr., and M. F. Miller
Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. II. Carcass composition and meat palatability of beef cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1384 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. S. Moore, F. D. Mujibi, and E. L. Sherman
Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E41 - E47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. M. Larson, J. L. Martin, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston
Winter grazing system and supplementation during late gestation influence performance of beef cows and steer progeny
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 1147 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. L. Ferrell and J. W. Oltjen
ASAS CENTENNIAL PAPER: Net energy systems for beef cattle--Concepts, application, and future models
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2008; 86(10): 2779 - 2794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. F. M. Bonilha, L. O. Tedeschi, I. U. Packer, A. G. Razook, G. F. Alleoni, R. F. Nardon, and F. D. Resende
Evaluation of carcass characteristics of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds selected for postweaning weight
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1770 - 1780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. Van Groningen, C. J. B. Devitt, J. W. Wilton, and J. A. L. Cranfield
Economic evaluations of beef bulls in an integrated supply chain
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3219 - 3227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Baker, L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, W. R. Henning, and D. J. Ketchen
Using ultrasound measurements to predict body composition of yearling bulls
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2666 - 2672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. B. Williams, G. L. Bennett, T. G. Jenkins, L. V. Cundiff, and C. L. Ferrell
Using simulation models to predict feed intake: Phenotypic and genetic relationships between observed and predicted values in cattle
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1310 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, M. J. Baker, and D. P. Kirschten
Identifying differences in feed efficiency among group-fed cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 767 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. H. Abdelsamei, D. G. Fox, L. O. Tedeschi, M. L. Thonney, D. J. Ketchen, and J. R. Stouffer
The effect of milk intake on forage intake and growth of nursing calves
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. V. Anderson, R. J. Rasby, T. J. Klopfenstein, and R. T. Clark
An evaluation of production and economic efficiency of two beef systems from calving to slaughter
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 694 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. R. Brethour
The relationship of average backfat thickness of feedlot steers to performance and relative efficiency of fat and protein retention
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3366 - 3372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, and T. P. Tylutki
Potential Environmental Benefits of Ionophores in Ruminant Diets
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 1591 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. J. Guiroy, L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, and J. P. Hutcheson
The effects of implant strategy on finished body weight of beef cattle
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1791 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Animal Science.