|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 8 1983-1995, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
P. J. Guiroy, D. G. Fox, L. O. Tedeschi, M. J. Baker and M. D. Cravey
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. pjg13@cornell.edu
A published model designed to predict individual feed required for the observed shrunk BW and ADG of growing cattle when fed in groups was modified and evaluated to improve its accuracy. This model is needed to accurately bill feed and compute cost of gain in marketing programs based on individual animal management. Because of its importance in predicting energy required for growth, a database of 401 steers was used to develop an equation to predict percentage of empty-body fat (EBF) from carcass measurements (12th rib fat thickness, hot carcass weight, USDA quality grade, and longissimus muscle area), which accounted for 61% of the variation in EBF with no bias (P > 0.1). When tested with an independent data set of 951 steers, the equation accounted for 51% of the variation with 1% proportional bias. The large variation in the carcass measurements at a particular EBF observed in this study indicates further improvement is limited by the inability of carcass measurements to account for variation in fat distribution in the various carcass components. Because of its importance in setting the target end point, a database of 1,355 steers and heifers was used to determine the relationship between EBF and USDA quality grade. These data indicate growing and finishing cattle reach Select and low-Choice quality grades at an EBF of 26.15 +/- 0.19 and 28.61 +/- 0.20%, respectively (P < 0.05). A data set of 228 steers from different breeds from two serial slaughter studies indicated 14.26 +/- 1.52 kg of empty BW change are required to increase EBF one percentage unit for cattle fed high-energy diets; this adjustment is needed to adjust final shrunk BW to the target EBF end point. The model to predict DM required with modifications developed in this study was evaluated with data from 365 individually fed cattle and it accounted for 74% of the variation in observed DM consumed with no bias (P > 0.1). When the revised model was applied to a commercial feedlot data set containing 12,105 steers and heifers, the total observed DM consumed was predicted with a bias of less than 1%. The model presented in this study accounts for differences known to affect animal requirements (breed type, BW and ADG, and weight at the target EBF end point) and can be used to fairly allocate feed to individuals fed in a group under commercial feedlot conditions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F. Romero, M. J. Zuidhof, R. A. Renema, F. E. Robinson, and A. Naeima Nonlinear mixed models to study metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder hens Poult. Sci., June 1, 2009; 88(6): 1310 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Leheska, J. L. Montgomery, C. R. Krehbiel, D. A. Yates, J. P. Hutcheson, W. T. Nichols, M. Streeter, J. R. Blanton Jr., and M. F. Miller Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. II. Carcass composition and meat palatability of beef cattle J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1384 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Moore, F. D. Mujibi, and E. L. Sherman Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E41 - E47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Larson, J. L. Martin, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston Winter grazing system and supplementation during late gestation influence performance of beef cows and steer progeny J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 1147 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Ferrell and J. W. Oltjen ASAS CENTENNIAL PAPER: Net energy systems for beef cattle--Concepts, application, and future models J Anim Sci, October 1, 2008; 86(10): 2779 - 2794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. M. Bonilha, L. O. Tedeschi, I. U. Packer, A. G. Razook, G. F. Alleoni, R. F. Nardon, and F. D. Resende Evaluation of carcass characteristics of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds selected for postweaning weight J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1770 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Van Groningen, C. J. B. Devitt, J. W. Wilton, and J. A. L. Cranfield Economic evaluations of beef bulls in an integrated supply chain J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3219 - 3227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Baker, L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, W. R. Henning, and D. J. Ketchen Using ultrasound measurements to predict body composition of yearling bulls J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2666 - 2672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Williams, G. L. Bennett, T. G. Jenkins, L. V. Cundiff, and C. L. Ferrell Using simulation models to predict feed intake: Phenotypic and genetic relationships between observed and predicted values in cattle J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1310 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, M. J. Baker, and D. P. Kirschten Identifying differences in feed efficiency among group-fed cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 767 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Abdelsamei, D. G. Fox, L. O. Tedeschi, M. L. Thonney, D. J. Ketchen, and J. R. Stouffer The effect of milk intake on forage intake and growth of nursing calves J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 940 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Anderson, R. J. Rasby, T. J. Klopfenstein, and R. T. Clark An evaluation of production and economic efficiency of two beef systems from calving to slaughter J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 694 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Brethour The relationship of average backfat thickness of feedlot steers to performance and relative efficiency of fat and protein retention J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3366 - 3372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, and T. P. Tylutki Potential Environmental Benefits of Ionophores in Ruminant Diets J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 1591 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Guiroy, L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, and J. P. Hutcheson The effects of implant strategy on finished body weight of beef cattle J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1791 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |