Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 6 1475-1482, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) measurement of compositional differences in hams, loins, and bellies from conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)-fed stress-genotype pigs

J. E. Swan, F. C. Parrish Jr, B. R. Wiegand, S. T. Larsen, T. J. Baas and E. P. Berg
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

This study was designed to observe the effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation on lean content of pork carcass primal cuts (hams, loins, and bellies) and to determine the ability of total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) to predict lean content. A total of 64 crossbred growing-finishing barrows were placed on a control (soybean oil) or CLA (0.75%) diet at an average weight of 40 kg. Pigs were penned in pairs according to diet and stress genotype (negative, carrier, and positive) and slaughtered at 115 kg. Stress genotype was included because of known variations in lean content. Hams (IMPS 401A; n = 64), loins (IMPS 410; n = 24), and bellies (IMPS 408; n = 63) were fabricated from carcasses at 24 h postmortem and scanned for electromagnetic (EM) absorption by a MQ-25 EM scanner. Each wholesale cut was scanned in triplicate at 2.5 MHz to yield a peak mean average (PMA) value then separated into lean, fat, bone, and skin components. Bellies were skinned prior to scanning then subjected to a belly bar firmness test before dissection. Supplementation with CLA had no effect (P > 0.05) on lean ham composition. Regression analysis was used for lean weight prediction using primal weight and PMA value as predictors. Lean content prediction of hams by TOBEC resulted in an R2 of 0.80. Loins from CLA-supplemented pigs exhibited increased lean weight (P < 0.05) and PMA values (P < 0.05) compared to controls. Lean prediction of loins by TOBEC resulted in an R2 of 0.66. Bellies from CLA-supplemented pigs had a higher percentage of moisture (P < 0.03) and protein (P < 0.01) and decreased percentage of lipid (P < 0.01). The R2 values from the regression analysis predicting protein, moisture, protein + moisture, and fat-free soft tissue composition of the skinless bellies were 0.67, 0.68, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. L. Burr, C. G. Taylor, and H. A. Weiler Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid Does Not Adversely Affect Bone Mass in Obese fa/fa or Lean Zucker Rats. Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2006; 231(10): 1602 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Weber, B. T. Richert, M. A. Belury, Y. Gu, K. Enright, and A. P. Schinckel Evaluation of the effects of dietary fat, conjugated linoleic acid, and ractopamine on growth performance, pork quality, and fatty acid profiles in genetically lean gilts J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 720 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Dugan, J. L Aalhus, and J. K. Kramer Conjugated linoleic acid pork research Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 1212S - 1216S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]