Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 5 1067-1073, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of group size on pig performance in a wean-to-finish production system

B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, S. E. Curtis, N. R. Augspurger, D. N. Hamilton, E. N. Parr and D. M. Webel
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

Crossbred pigs (n = 1,400) were used to evaluate the effect of group size (25 vs 50 vs 100 pigs/pen) in a wean-to-finish production system on growth performance and carcass measures. Pigs were weaned at 17 d (range = 15 to 19) of age with a mean initial BW of 5.9 +/- 0.02 kg and taken to a final mean pen weight of 116 +/- 0.9 kg. A 10-phase dietary regimen was used, and pigs had free access to feed and water. Feeder-trough space (4.3 cm/pig) and floor-area allowance (0.68 m2/pig) were the same for all group sizes. Compared to groups of 25, pigs in groups of 50 and 100 animals were lighter (P < 0.001) at the end of wk 8 after weaning and had lower (3%, P < 0.01) ADG and gain:feed (G/F) but similar (P > 0.05) ADFI during the first 8 wk of the study. At the end of the study, pig weight and the coefficient of variation in pig weight within a pen were similar (P > 0.05) across group sizes. During the period from 8 wk after weaning to the end of the study, pigs in groups of 100 compared to 50 animals had greater (3%, P < 0.01) ADG, and pigs in groups of 25 were intermediate for ADG. Average daily feed intake during this period was similar (P > 0.05) for all group sizes; however, G/F was greater (3%, P < 0.01) for groups of 100 compared to 25 or 50 animals. For the overall study period, ADG, ADFI, and G/F from weaning to slaughter weight were similar across group sizes (P > 0.05; 655, 648, and 658 g; 1,759, 1,755, and 1,759 g; and 0.37, 0.37, and 0.37; for ADG, ADFI, and G/F, respectively, for groups of 25, 50, and 100 pigs, respectively). Mortality was similar (P > 0.05) across group sizes; however, morbidity (pigs removed due to poor health or injury) was higher in groups of 25 pigs compared to the other two group sizes (7.0, 3.5, and 3.9% for groups of 25, 50, and 100, respectively; P < 0.05). Group-size treatment did not affect (P > 0.05) carcass dressing percentage, backfat thickness, or loin-eye depth. In summary, growth performance from weaning to market weight was not affected by group size.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. M. Hill, S. K. Baido, G. L. Cromwell, D. C. Mahan, J. L. Nelssen, H. H. Stein, and NCCC-42 Committee on Swine Nutrition Evaluation of sex and lysine during the nursery period J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1453 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Wellock, G. C. Emmans, and I. Kyriazakis Predicting the consequences of social stressors on pig food intake and performance J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 2995 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, B. P. Corrigan, J. M. DeDecker, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr, and D. M. Webel Effect of restricted postweaning growth resulting from reduced floor and feeder-trough space on pig growth performance to slaughter weight in a wean-to-finish production system J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 836 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Schmolke, Y. Z. Li, and H. W. Gonyou Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 874 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr, and D. M. Webel Effects of feeder-trough space and variation in body weight within a pen of pigs on performance in a wean-to-finish production system J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2241 - 2246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]