Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 2 333-338, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of threshold vs linear and animal vs sire models for predicting direct and maternal genetic effects on calving difficulty in beef cattle

R. Ramirez-Valverde, I. Misztal and J. K. Bertrand
Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.

This study compared the accuracy of several models for obtaining genetic evaluations of calving difficulty. The models were univariate threshold animal (TAM), threshold sire-maternal grandsire (TSM), linear animal (LAM), and linear sire-maternal grandsire (LSM) models and bivariate threshold-linear animal (TLAM), threshold-linear sire-maternal grandsire (TLSM), linear-linear animal (LLAM), and linear-linear sire-maternal grandsire (LLSM) models for calving difficulty and birth weight. Data were obtained from the American Gelbvieh Association and included 84,420 first-parity records of both calving difficulty and birth weight. Calving difficulty scores were distributed as 73.4% in the first category (no assistance), 18.7% in the second, 6.3% in the third, and 1.6% in the fourth. Included in the animal models were fixed sex of calf by age of dam subclasses, random herd-year-season effects, and random animal direct and maternal breeding values. Sire-maternal grandsire models were similar to the animal models, with animal and maternal effects replaced by sire and maternal grandsire effects. Models were compared using a data splitting technique based on the correlation of estimated breeding values from two samples, with one-half of the calving difficulty records discarded randomly in the first sample and the remaining calving difficulty records discarded in the second sample. Reported correlations are averages of 10 replicates. The results obtained using animal models confirmed the slight advantage of TAM over LAM (0.69 vs 0.63) and TLAM over LLAM (0.90 vs 0.86). Bivariate analyses greatly improved the accuracy of genetic prediction of direct effects on calving difficulty relative to univariate analyses. Similar ranking of the models was found for maternal effects, but smaller correlations were obtained for bivariate models. For sire-maternal grandsire models, no differences between sire or maternal grandsire correlations were observed for TLSM compared to LLSM, and small differences were observed between TSM and LSM. The threshold model offered advantages over the linear model in animal models but not in sire-maternal grandsire models. For genetic evaluation of calving difficulty in beef cattle, the threshold-linear animal model seems to be the best choice for predicting both direct and maternal effects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hinger, H. Brandt, and G. Erhardt Heritability Estimates for Antibody Response to Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in German Holstein Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3237 - 3244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Gengler, S. Abras, C. Verkenne, S. Vanderick, M. Szydlowski, and R. Renaville Accuracy of Prediction of Gene Content in Large Animal Populations and its Use for Candidate Gene Detection and Genetic Evaluation J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1652 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. David, L. Bodin, G. Lagriffoul, C. Leymarie, E. Manfredi, and C. Robert-Granie Genetic Analysis of Male and Female Fertility After Artificial Insemination in Sheep: Comparison of Single-Trait and Joint Models J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3917 - 3923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Silvestre, M. M. D. Ginja, A. J. A. Ferreira, and J. Colaco Comparison of estimates of hip dysplasia genetic parameters in Estrela Mountain Dog using linear and threshold models J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1880 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Gutierrez, F. Goyache, I. Fernandez, I. Alvarez, and L. J. Royo Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight, and weaning weight in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 69 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Jamrozik, J. Fatehi, G. J. Kistemaker, and L. R. Schaeffer Estimates of Genetic Parameters for Canadian Holstein Female Reproduction Traits J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2199 - 2208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Mark Applied Genetic Evaluations for Production and Functional Traits in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2641 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Eriksson, A. Nasholm, K. Johansson, and J. Philipsson Genetic relationships between calving and carcass traits for Charolais and Hereford cattle in Sweden J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2269 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hansen, I. Misztal, M. S. Lund, J. Pedersen, and L. G. Christensen Undesired Phenotypic and Genetic Trend for Stillbirth in Danish Holsteins J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1477 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Eriksson, A. Nasholm, K. Johansson, and J. Philipsson Genetic parameters for calving difficulty, stillbirth, and birth weight for Hereford and Charolais at first and later parities J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Phocas and D. Laloe Evaluation models and genetic parameters for calving difficulty in beef cattle J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 933 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]