J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shackelford, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Koohmaraie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shackelford, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Koohmaraie, M.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 10 2605-2614, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef

S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, M. K. Meade, J. O. Reagan, B. L. Byrnes and M. Koohmaraie
Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA. shackelford@email.marc.usda.gov

With the recent development of technology to classify beef for tenderness, it is now possible for packers and retailers to market brands of beef known to be consistently tender. The present experiment was conducted to determine consumer impressions of Tender Select, a model beef brand comprised of cuts from tender U.S. Select carcasses. A telephone survey was conducted in metropolitan Denver, CO, to recruit consumers (n = 1,036) for this study. Consumers who met minimal limits for household income, age, and beef consumption were invited to participate in a beef shopping and usage study in a local supermarket. Point-of-purchase material was developed that described Tender Select as "the only steak guaranteed tender and lean." When shown a copy of the Tender Select concept card, 89% of participating consumers (n = 759) indicated that they would definitely or probably buy that product. Of those consumers that said they would buy the product, 35% indicated that their purchases of Tender Select would be in addition to their current fresh meat purchases. Most consumers (54.1%) indicated that if Tender Select was available at their grocery store, 1 or 2 of their next 10 purchases of beef cuts would be Tender Select. Sixty-five percent of consumers indicated that if a grocery store carried a line of beef cuts guaranteed to be tender, they would buy all of their beef at that store. Both strip loins from 104 U.S. Select beef carcasses, representing a broad range (8.7 to 43.4 kg; CV = 42%) in slice shear force (SSF) at 14 d postmortem, were used to determine the effect of SSF classification on consumer satisfaction and the correlation among trained sensory panel descriptive attribute ratings and in-home consumer ratings of beef longissimus steaks. Both trained sensory panelists and consumers rated low-SSF steaks higher than the high-SSF steaks for all traits (P < 0.001). All consumer traits (like, tenderness, juiciness, flavor like, flavor amount, and overall satisfaction) were more highly correlated with SSF and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings than with sensory panel flavor or juiciness ratings. These data show that tenderness is the primary determinant of satisfaction among consumers of U.S. Select top loin steaks and that a segment of consumers would pay a premium to purchase guaranteed-tender U.S. Select steaks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. D. Weaver, B. C. Bowker, and D. E. Gerrard
Sarcomere length influences postmortem proteolysis of excised bovine semitendinosus muscle
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1925 - 1932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Carnagey, E. J. Huff-Lonergan, A. Trenkle, A. E. Wertz-Lutz, R. L. Horst, and D. C. Beitz
Use of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and vitamin E to improve tenderness of beef from the longissimus dorsi of heifers
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1649 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. R. Rust, D. M. Price, J. Subbiah, G. Kranzler, G. G. Hilton, D. L. Vanoverbeke, and J. B. Morgan
Predicting beef tenderness using near-infrared spectroscopy
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. C. Kukowski, R. J. Maddock, and D. M. Wulf
Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. Rhee, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 534 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
The accuracy and repeatability of untrained laboratory consumer panelists in detecting differences in beef longissimus tenderness
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 557 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. M. Wyle, D. J. Vote, D. L. Roeber, R. C. Cannell, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, M. Goldberg, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith
Effectiveness of the SmartMV prototype BeefCam System to sort beef carcasses into expected palatability groups
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Wheeler, D. Vote, J. M. Leheska, S. D. Shackelford, K. E. Belk, D. M. Wulf, B. L. Gwartney, and M. Koohmaraie
The efficacy of three objective systems for identifying beef cuts that can be guaranteed tender
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3315 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Animal Science.