J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Block, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Block, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, D. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 1 133-140, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science


EVALUATION STUDIES

Manipulation of cattle growth to target carcass quality

H. C. Block, J. J. McKinnon, A. F. Mustafa and D. A. Christensen
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Two trials were conducted to determine the effects of breed type, backgrounding program, and backfat end point (USBFEP) as determined by ultrasound on the performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. Trial 1 utilized 144 large-framed Charolais- (304.6 +/- 16.3 kg) and 144 medium-framed Hereford-cross steers (294.8 +/- 20.9 kg). Trial 2 utilized 88 medium-framed Angus (289.5 +/- 15.0 kg), 88 large-framed Charolais- (299.8 +/- 17.7 kg), and 88 medium-framed Hereford-cross (291.1 +/- 20.9 kg) steers. Within breed type, short- (70 d) or long-term (126 d) backgrounding programs (Trial 1) and 6- or 12-mm USBFEP (Trials 1 and 2) were assigned. In both trials, carcass size was greater (P < 0.05) for the large-framed Charolais-cross steers, longer backgrounding, and fatter USBFEP treatments. Lean meat yield was greater (P < 0.05) for Charolais- than Hereford-cross steers (Trial 1) and for the leaner USBFEP (Trials 1 and 2). Marbling was greater (P < 0.05) for Angus- (Trial 2) and Charolais- (Trials 1 and 2) than Hereford-cross steers (Trials 1 and 2) and for the fatter end point (Trials 1 and 2). It was concluded that breed type, backgrounding program, and USBFEP were effective in altering growth and could be used to target carcass traits of interest for value-based marketing programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Bergen, S. P. Miller, J. W. Wilton, D. H. Crews Jr., and I. B. Mandell
Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 1. Carcass lean percentage
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 546 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Bergen, S. P. Miller, J. W. Wilton, and I. B. Mandell
Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 2. Carcass fat partitioning
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. L. Bengochea, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, and S. A. Soto-Navarro
Effect of grain processing degree on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and performance characteristics of steers fed medium-concentrate growing diets
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2815 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. A. Pyatt, L. L. Berger, D. B. Faulkner, P. M. Walker, and S. L. Rodriguez-Zas
Factors affecting carcass value and profitability in early-weaned Simmental steers: II. Days on feed endpoints and sorting strategies
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2926 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. J. Kononoff, H. M. Deobald, E. L. Stewart, A. D. Laycock, and F. L. S. Marquess
The effect of a leptin single nucleotide polymorphism on quality grade, yield grade, and carcass weight of beef cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 927 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Animal Science.