Journal of Animal Science, Vol 79, Issue 1 1-4, Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Animal Science

EVALUATION STUDIES

Calf removal improves conception rates to the Ovsynch and CO-Synch protocols

T. W. Geary, J. C. Whittier, D. M. Hallford and M. D. MacNeil
USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh, Miles City, MT 59301, USA. tgeary@larrl.ars.usda.gov

Beef cows (n = 473) from two locations were stratified by breed, postpartum interval, age, and AI sire and were randomly allotted to one of four treatments for synchronization of ovulation. Ovulation synchronization protocols included the Ovsynch protocol with (n = 114) or without (n = 123) 48-h calf removal from d 7 to 9 (d 0 = 1st GnRH injection) or the CO-Synch protocol with (n = 119) or without (n = 117) 48-h calf removal from d 7 to 9. The Ovsynch protocol included administration of GnRH (100 microg; i.m.) on d 0, PGF2alpha (25 mg; i.m.) on d 7, GnRH (100 microg; i.m.) on d 9, and timed insemination on d 10. The CO-Synch protocol included administration of GnRH (100 microg; i.m.) on d 0, PGF2alpha (25 mg; i.m.) on d 7, and GnRH (100 microg; i.m.) with timed insemination on d 9. Blood samples were collected from all cows on d -10 and d 0 for analysis of serum progesterone. Cows with at least one serum progesterone concentration greater than 1 ng/mL were considered to be cyclic at the time of treatment. Conception rates of cows that received the CO-Synch + calf removal, Ovsynch + calf removal, CO-Synch, or Ovsynch protocol (63, 61, 54, and 52%, respectively) were not different (P = 0.50). Conception rates were not different (P = 0.80) among CO-Synch- and Ovsynch-treated cows; however, both estrual status and 48-h calf removal affected conception rates. Conception rates of cyclic cows (66%) were greater (P = 0.01) than those of anestrous cows (53%), regardless of which synchronization protocol was used. When data were pooled across synchronization protocol, conception rates of cows with 48-h calf removal (62%) were greater (P = 0.09) than conception rates of cows without calf removal (53%). The CO-Synch + calf removal protocol induces a fertile ovulation in cyclic and anestrous cows, requires handling cattle just three times, results in high conception rates from timed insemination, and should be a useful program for synchronization of ovulation in beef cows.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. G. S. Filho, E. R. Vilela, T. W. Geary, and J. L. M. Vasconcelos Strategies to improve fertility in postpartum multiparous Bos indicus cows submitted to a fixed-time insemination protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin F2{alpha} J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 2806 - 2814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Busch, J. A. Atkins, J. F. Bader, D. J. Schafer, D. J. Patterson, T. W. Geary, and M. F. Smith Effect of ovulatory follicle size and expression of estrus on progesterone secretion in beef cows J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 553 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Berardinelli, P. S. Joshi, and S. A. Tauck Conception rates to artificial insemination in primiparous, suckled cows exposed to the biostimulatory effect of bulls before and during a gonadotropin-releasing hormone-based estrus synchronization protocol J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 848 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Larson, G. C. Lamb, J. S. Stevenson, S. K. Johnson, M. L. Day, T. W. Geary, D. J. Kesler, J. M. DeJarnette, F. N. Schrick, A. DiCostanzo, et al. Synchronization of estrus in suckled beef cows for detected estrus and artificial insemination and timed artificial insemination using gonadotropin-releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2{alpha}, and progesterone J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 332 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Stegner, F. N. Kojima, M. R. Ellersieck, M. C. Lucy, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson A comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus in postpartum beef cows J Anim Sci, April 1, 2004; 82(4): 1016 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Stegner, F. N. Kojima, J. F. Bader, M. C. Lucy, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson Follicular dynamics and steroid profiles in cows during and after treatment with progestin-based protocols for synchronization of estrus J Anim Sci, April 1, 2004; 82(4): 1022 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Hiers, C. R. Barthle, MK. V. Dahms, G. E. Portillo, G. A. Bridges, D. O. Rae, W. W. Thatcher, and J. V. Yelich Synchronization of Bos indicusxBos taurus cows for timed artificial insemination using gonadotropin-releasing hormone plus prostaglandin F2{alpha} in combination with melengestrol acetate J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 830 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Stevenson, G. C. Lamb, S. K. Johnson, M. A. Medina-Britos, D. M. Grieger, K. R. Harmoney, J. A. Cartmill, S. Z. El-Zarkouny, C. R. Dahlen, and T. J. Marple Supplemental norgestomet, progesterone, or melengestrol acetate increases pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows after timed inseminations J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 571 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Martinez, J. P. Kastelic, G. P. Adams, and R. J. Mapletoft The use of a progesterone-releasing device (CIDR-B) or melengestrol acetate with GnRH, LH, or estradiol benzoate for fixed-time AI in beef heifers J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1746 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]