J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolter, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Webel, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolter, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Webel, D. M.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 8 2062-2067, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Group size and floor-space allowance can affect weanling-pig performance

B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr and D. M. Webel
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

Crossbred weanling piglets (n = 1,920; mean initial BW, 5.3 +/- .7 kg) were used in two 9-wk trials employing a randomized block design in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to determine effects of group size (20 [Small = S] or 100 [Large = L] pigs/pen) and floor-space allowance (calculated requirement [CR] or calculated requirement less 50% of estimated "free space" [CR-50]) on growth performance. Free space was estimated for each group size. From wk 1 through 4 after weaning, S and L groups at CR were allowed a floor space of .17 m2/pig, and at CR-50, S and L groups were allowed .15 m2/pig and .13 m2/pig, respectively. From wk 5 through 9 after weaning, all CR treatment pigs were provided a floor space of .38 m2/pig, and for the CR-50 treatment, S and L pigs were allowed .32 m2/pig and .28 m2/pig, respectively. Piglets had free access to feed and water. Feeder-trough space per pig was the same for both group sizes. Feed-intake data were collected for only wk 1 through 4. Group size by floor-space allowance interactions (P < .05) were found for gain/feed ratio (G/F) for wk 1 and wk 2 through 4, but not for wk 1 through 4. Piglets in L groups were lighter (P < .001) at the end of wk 1, 4, and 9 by 2, 4, and 5%, respectively, and had lower ADG (6%; P < .001) throughout the trial than S piglets. During wk 1 through 4, feed intake was lower (7%, P < .001) in L piglets than in S piglets, but G/F was similar (P > .05). Piglets in CR groups had greater ADG (5%; P < .01) throughout the trial, with a greater G/F (P < .05) for wk 1 through 4, and were heavier (P < .01) than those in CR-50 groups at the end of wk 4 (3%) and 9 (4%). Pigs in L groups had a greater within-pen coefficient of variation in BW at the end of wk 9 than pigs in S groups. Large groups and reduced floor-space allowance reduced piglet growth performance in the nursery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. R. Street and H. W. Gonyou
Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior, and physiological variables
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 982 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. M. Hill, S. K. Baido, G. L. Cromwell, D. C. Mahan, J. L. Nelssen, H. H. Stein, and NCCC-42 Committee on Swine Nutrition
Evaluation of sex and lysine during the nursery period
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. W. Gonyou, M. C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S. A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J. J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R. B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, et al.
Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 229 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
I. J. Wellock, G. C. Emmans, and I. Kyriazakis
Predicting the consequences of social stressors on pig food intake and performance
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 2995 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. N. Hamilton, M. Ellis, B. F. Wolter, A. P. Schinckel, and E. R. Wilson
The growth performance of the progeny of two swine sire lines reared under different floor space allowances
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1126 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. A. Schmolke, Y. Z. Li, and H. W. Gonyou
Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 874 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.