Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 7 1973-1982, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Forage systems for production of stocker steers in the upper south

V. G. Allen, J. P. Fontenot and R. A. Brock
Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0306, USA. Felician@ttacs.ttu.edu

The southern states produce large numbers of beef calves that are generally weaned and sold in autumn. Keeping calves in this region beyond weaning to graze high-quality forages through a stocker cattle phase could improve profitability. Autumn-weaned Angus crossbred steers were allocated by breeding and weight to four forage systems that began in mid-November and continued through mid-October as follows: System 1, tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.)-white clover (Trifolium repens L.); System 2, tall fescue, caucasian bluestem (Bothriochloa caucasica [Trin.] C. E. Hubbard) and tall fescue-red clover (Trifolium pratense L.); System 3, orchardgrass-alfalfa and bluegrass-white clover; and System 4, rye (Secale cereale L.), soybeans (Glycine max)-foxtail millet (Setaria italica), and bluegrass-white clover. All steers were supplemented with hay or silage previously cut from their respective systems when forage for grazing was limited. System 2 which used stockpiled tall fescue for winter grazing and caucasian bluestem for summer forage plus fescuered clover for hay and grazing in a three-paddock system, resulted in greater (P < .01) gain per hectare and per steer, more grazing days, and reduced stored forage requirements and produced more surplus feed than the other systems tested. Gains per hectare for Systems 1 through 4 were 454, 554, 472, and 487 kg (SE = 18), respectively. Harvested forage from Systems 1, 2, and 3 met needs for stored forages but System 4 required additional "purchased" hay. Stored forage was fed for 61, 38, 112, or 104 d for Systems 1 through 4, respectively. Within the physio-climatic region of this experiment, a simple three-paddock system based on cool- and warm-season perennial forages could improve beef production per unit of land area while reducing inputs of labor and equipment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. J. Guretzky, J. R. Russell, D. R. Strohbehn, and D. G. Morrical Grazing and feedlot performance of yearling stocker cattle integrated with spring- and fall-calving beef cows in a year-round grazing system J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2696 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Philipp, V. G. Allen, R. B. Mitchell, C. P. Brown, and D. B. Wester Forage Nutritive Value and Morphology of Three Old World Bluestems under a Range of Irrigation Levels Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2258 - 2268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Janovick, J. R. Russell, D. R. Strohbehn, and D. G. Morrical Productivity and hay requirements of beef cattle in a Midwestern year-round grazing system J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2503 - 2515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]