J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackey, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Diskin, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackey, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Diskin, M. G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 7 1917-1929, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of progesterone alone or in combination with estradiol on follicular dynamics, gonadotropin profiles, and estrus in beef cows following calf isolation and restricted suckling

D. R. Mackey, J. M. Sreenan, J. F. Rochet and M. G. Diskin
Teagasc, Research Centre, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.

The effects of calf isolation and restricted suckling on LH pulse characteristics and interval to first ovulation (postpartum interval) were studied in 52 multiparous beef cows, with or without exogenous progesterone. At 30 d postpartum, cows were randomly allocated to one of four treatments (n = 13/treatment): 1) Ad lib, ad libitum access of cows to calves; 2) CI/RS, calf isolation/restricted suckling, where suckling was restricted to once daily; 3) CI/RS+P4, same as CI/RS but cows received an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device at calf isolation for 6 d; or 4) CI/RS+P4+E2, as CI/RS+P4 but the intravaginal progesterone-releasing device had a 10-mg estradiol capsule attached. Daily ovarian scanning and twice-daily blood sampling were performed from d 25 postpartum until the day of second ovulation. A random sample of cows from each treatment (n = 31 in total) were blood-sampled at 15-min intervals for 10 h on d 29, 32, 35, and 38. Ovulatory response to treatment was regarded as ovulation of either the dominant follicle growing at d 30 or the subsequent DF. There was a treatment x day effect (P = .09) on LH pulse frequency, but neither progesterone (CI/ RS+P4) nor progesterone and estradiol (CI/RS+P4+E2) treatment suppressed the calf isolation/restricted suckling-induced increase in LH pulse frequency. The estradiol capsule (CI/RS+P4+E2) delivered sufficient estradiol to delay new follicle wave emergence (treatment x stage; P < .001) and the associated preemergence increase in concentrations of FSH (treatment, P < .05) in cows treated at the postselection stage of follicle wave development, prolonging dominance of the dominant follicle present at treatment initiation (P < .001). The number of cows that ovulated in response to treatment was greater (P < .001) in cows with calf isolation/restricted suckling than in cows suckled ad libitum. Hence, cows assigned to the Ad lib treatment had a longer postpartum interval (P < .001) than cows of the other treatments. Exogenous progesterone treatment increased the frequency of cows exhibiting clinical signs of estrus at first ovulation (P < .001) and reduced the frequency of short estrous cycles (P < .001). We conclude that, in beef cows with calves, a 6-d progesterone treatment does not suppress the calf isolation/restricted suckling-induced increase in LH pulse frequency. Hence, on progesterone withdrawal, the LH pulse frequency is sufficient to stimulate first ovulation, accompanied by overt estrous expression and elimination of a short estrous cycle in most cows.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. M. Rhodes, S. McDougall, C. R. Burke, G. A. Verkerk, and K. L. Macmillan
Invited Review: Treatment of Cows with an Extended Postpartum Anestrous Interval
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2003; 86(6): 1876 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.