|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 6 1608-1624, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
J. E. Sprinkle, J. W. Holloway, B. G. Warrington, W. C. Ellist, J. W. Stuth, T. D. Forbes and L. W. Greene
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Uvalde 78801, USA. sprinkle@ag.arizona.edu
The objective of this study was to determine whether digesta kinetics, energy intake (EI, kcal ME intake x kg(-.75) x d(-1)), grazing behavior, or body temperature differed by breed, lactational state, or season of the year among cattle presumed to vary in adaptability to the subtropics. Two-year-old lactating and nonlactating Brahman x Angus (BA; n = 5, n = 5), Tuli x Angus (TA; n = 5, n = 4), and Angus (A; n = 4, n = 4) cows were used. During both early (ES) and late summer (LS), lactating cattle vs nonlactating cattle had greater gastrointestinal tract load (CM2) and EI (P < .01), although passage rate did not differ (P > .48). During LS, lactating cattle had decreased early morning rectal temperatures (P < .05) and spent more time grazing during the day compared with nonlactating cattle (P < .001). Among breeds, A had the largest CM2 (P < .01 compared with BA and P = .068 compared with TA) and accumulated the greatest heat during the day (P < .05). Due to greater daytime shading (P < .01) and less daytime grazing (P < .05), A had lower (P < .05) early morning and comparable (P > .26) late afternoon rectal temperatures compared with BA and TA. With data pooled over both grazing trials, BA cattle had the smallest CM2 (P < .01), and in ES they spent the least amount of time in the shade (P < .001). The TA spent more time in the shade than did BA (P < .001) during ES and less during LS (P < .001) and had similar (P > .28) early morning rectal temperatures compared with BA during ES and LS. During LS, TA spent more time in the sun and less time in the shade than did either A or BA (P < .001). During ES, EI did not differ among breeds (P > .50). During LS, EI for lactating A was greater than for BA and TA (P < .05), and EI for nonlactating BA was less than for A and TA (P < .05). Bite rate per minute for lactating cattle during ES was reduced (P < .03) by increased body condition score. Tuli x Angus cattle appear to be comparable to BA with respect to heat adaptation. It appears that EI demands are greater in a hot environment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Pfister, K. E. Panter, D. R. Gardner, D. Cook, and K. D. Welch Effect of body condition on consumption of pine needles (Pinus ponderosa) by beef cows J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3608 - 3616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Merrill, R. P. Ansotegui, P. D. Burns, M. D. MacNeil, and T. W. Geary Effects of flunixin meglumine and transportation on establishment of pregnancy in beef cows J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1547 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Pinchak, D. R. Tolleson, M. McCloy, L. J. Hunt, R. J. Gill, R. J. Ansley, and S. J. Bevers Morbidity effects on productivity and profitability of stocker cattle grazing in the Southern Plains J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2773 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |