J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lensink, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Veissier, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lensink, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Veissier, I.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 5 1213-1218, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reducing veal calves' reactivity to people by providing additional human contact

B. J. Lensink, X. Boivin, P. Pradel, P. Le Neindre and I. Veissier
INRA, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, Unite de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Saint-Genes Champanelle, France. lensink@clermont.inra.fr

We studied the importance of the stockperson's behavior on veal calf behavior using 22 veal calves housed in individual crates. Eleven calves received minimal contact from the stockperson, and the other 11 calves were stroked and allowed to suck the stockperson's fingers after each meal during the entire fattening period (21 wk). The effects of this additional contact with the stockperson on the calves' responses to people was studied, when in their home environment (crate) or outside their home environment (singly in a novel arena). When tested in their home environment, the calves receiving additional contact withdrew less from the approach of humans (familiar or unfamiliar) (P < .05) compared with control calves. When tested outside the home environment with a human (familiar or unfamiliar) standing motionless, calves that had received additional contact interacted more frequently and for a longer time with the humans and defecated less often compared with control calves (P < .05). In conclusion, being stroked and sucking the stockperson's fingers seemed to be experienced as positive by the calf, because they reduced withdrawal from and increased approaches to familiar and unfamiliar humans in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Such a lower reactivity to people could improve ease of handling, animal performance, and animal welfare.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
J. K. Apple, E. B. Kegley, D. L. Galloway, T. J. Wistuba, and L. K. Rakes
Duration of restraint and isolation stress as a model to study the dark-cutting condition in cattle
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 1202 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.