Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 4 865-870, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of eating space and availability of water in feeders on productivity and eating behavior of grower/finisher pigs

H. W. Gonyou and Z. Lou
Prairie Swine Centre, Inc., Saskatoon, SK, Canada. gonyou@sask.usask.ca

Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of eating space and availability of water within feeders on the productivity and behavior of growing/finishing pigs. In Exp. 1, 12 commercial feeders were classified as being either single-space (SS) or multiple-space (MS), and either as dry (D) or wet/dry (WD), resulting in two SS-D, four MS-D, three SS-WD and three MS-WD models. Each model was evaluated using four pens of 12 pigs, which were fed a mash diet throughout the growing/finishing period (25 to 106 kg). Pigs were videotaped when they were approximately 40 and 80 kg in weight to determine eating behavior. The number of feeding spaces did not affect the productivity of the pigs, but the presence of water within the feeder resulted in increases in ADFI (P < .05) and ADG (P < .05) and a reduction in carcass lean (P < .05). Pigs eating from SS feeders spent 15% less time eating than those fed from two-space feeders (P < .05), and occupancy rate for feeding spaces was increased by 75% (P < .05). The WD feeders also resulted in a reduction (17%) in eatingtime compared to D models (P < .01), and occupancy rate for WD feeders was similarly reduced (P < .05). Pigs spent 16% less time eating when they weighed approximately 80 kg than when they weighed 40 kg (P < .01). In Exp. 2, rate of eating was determined during a short test on the same 12 feeder models for both small (48 kg) and large (90 kg) pigs. Large pigs ate faster than small pigs, but eating rate was not affected by feeding space or presence of water in the feeder. In Exp. 3, eating rate was determined for small amounts of dry or wet feed. Premixing water with the feed (1:1 ratio by weight) increased eating speed (P < .01). We concluded that 12 pigs can be fed from a single-space feeder without affecting productivity. The inclusion of water within a feeder decreases time spent eating, but it increases ADFI and ADG. When pigs are small, they spend more time eating, and feeder occupancy rates are higher than when they are large.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, B. P. Corrigan, J. M. DeDecker, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr, and D. M. Webel Effect of restricted postweaning growth resulting from reduced floor and feeder-trough space on pig growth performance to slaughter weight in a wean-to-finish production system J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 836 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Schmolke, Y. Z. Li, and H. W. Gonyou Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 874 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr, and D. M. Webel Effects of feeder-trough space and variation in body weight within a pen of pigs on performance in a wean-to-finish production system J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2241 - 2246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]