J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bromley, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Vleck, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bromley, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Vleck, L. D.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 4 846-858, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic parameters among weight, prolificacy, and wool traits of Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep

C. M. Bromley, G. D. Snowder and L. D. Van Vleck
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA. bromleyc@exchange.nci.nih.gov

Genetic parameters for Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep were estimated using REML with animal models for prolificacy, weight, and wool traits. All bivariate analyses included a covariance between additive genetic effects for the two traits plus appropriate additional covariances. Number of observations by breed ranged from 5,140 to 7,095 for prolificacy traits, from 7,750 to 9,530 for weight traits, and from 4,603 to 34,746 for wool traits. Heritability estimates ranged from .03 to .11 for prolificacy traits (litter size at birth and litter size at weaning), from .09 to .26 for weight traits (birth weight and average daily gain), and from .25 to .53 for wool traits (fleece weight, fleece grade and staple length). Estimates of direct genetic correlations among prolificacy and among weight traits were positive and ranged from .58 to 1.00 and .18 to 1.00, respectively. Estimates of direct genetic correlation between fleece weight and staple length were positive (.50 to .70) but were negative between fleece weight and fleece grade (-.60 to -.34) and between staple length and fleece grade (-.72 and -.40). Prolificacy and wool traits were essentially uncorrelated. Weight and prolificacy traits were slightly positively correlated. Weight traits had a moderate positive direct genetic correlation with fleece weight and staple length, but were uncorrelated with fleece grade. These estimates of genetic parameters between prolificacy, weight, and wool traits can be used to construct multiple-trait selection indexes for dual-purpose sheep.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. A. Kuehn, R. M. Lewis, and D. R. Notter
Connectedness in Targhee and Suffolk flocks participating in the United States National Sheep Improvement Program
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 507 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. C. Borg, D. R. Notter, L. A. Kuehn, and R. W. Kott
Breeding objectives for Targhee sheep
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 2815 - 2829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. M. Sawalha, G. D. Snowder, J. F. Keown, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic relationship between milk score and litter weight for Targhee, Columbia, Rambouillet, and Polypay sheep
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 786 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Hanford, L. D. Van Vleck, and G. D. Snowder
Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Targhee sheep
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 630 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Hanford, L. D. Van Vleck, and G. D. Snowder
Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Columbia sheep
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3086 - 3098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.