J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermesmeyer, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hermesmeyer, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, R. T., Jr

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 4 825-831, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of energy intake, implantation, and subcutaneous fat end point on feedlot steer performance and carcass composition

G. N. Hermesmeyer, L. L. Berger, T. G. Nash and R. T. Brandt Jr
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of energy intake, implantation, and fat end point on feedlot performance and carcass composition of steers. Three hundred eighty-four yearling crossbred steers (368 +/- 23.1 kg) were allotted in a completely randomized design. Treatments were arranged in a 2 x 3 x 2 factorial experiment. Main effect factors were two levels of intake, three implant strategies, and two compositional fat end points at slaughter. The levels of intake were ad libitum (AL) and restricted (RS) intake (90% ad libitum). The three implant strategies were Revalor-S (REV) (120 mg trenbolone acetate, 24 mg estradiol), Synovex-Plus (SYN) (200 mg trenbolone acetate, 28 mg estradiol benzoate), and no implant (control). The compositional target end points were 1.0 and 1.4 cm s.c. fat cover over the 12th and 13th rib. Restricted-intake steers consumed 9.2% less (P < .01) DM than AL steers. Ad libitum-intake steers gained weight 15.5% more rapidly (P < .01) than RS-intake steers. Steers implanted with REV tended (P < .07) to gain faster than SYN steers, who in turn gained 15.2% more (P < .01) than control steers. Ad libitum-intake steers were 4.8% more (P < .01) efficient than RS steers. Steers fed to a targeted 1.4 cm s.c. backfat cover were 2.9% less (P < .05) efficient than steers fed to 1.0 cm, and steers implanted with either REV or SYN had similar (P = .47) feed efficiencies, whereas control steers had lower (P < .01) feed efficiencies. Steers fed to a targeted compositional fat end point of 1.4 cm had 1.3% higher (P < .01) dressing percentage (DP) than steers fed to 1.0 cm. Control and SYN steers had similar (P = .13) DP; however, REV steers had 6.1% greater (P < .01) DP than SYN steers. Steers fed to 1.4 cm s.c. fat end point had higher (P < .01) numerical yield grades than steers fed to 1.0 cm (3.34 vs 2.71). There was an interaction (P < .01) for intake level and implant for marbling score. Marbling scores were lower (P < .05) for RS x SYN and AL x REV than in other treatments. Steers on the RS x REV treatment were intermediate in marbling to all treatments except AL control, which was higher (P < .01) than RS x SYN, AL x REV, and RS x REV. No interaction for dry matter intake level and anabolic implants was observed for growth performance. The depression in carcass quality resulting from implanting is reduced as backfat increases from 1.0 to 1.4 cm at slaughter.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. R. Smith, S. K. Duckett, M. J. Azain, R. N. Sonon Jr., and T. D. Pringle
The effect of anabolic implants on intramuscular lipid deposition in finished beef cattle
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 430 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. McPhee, J. W. Oltjen, T. R. Famula, and R. D. Sainz
Meta-analysis of factors affecting carcass characteristics of feedlot steers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3143 - 3154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. J. Kononoff, H. M. Deobald, E. L. Stewart, A. D. Laycock, and F. L. S. Marquess
The effect of a leptin single nucleotide polymorphism on quality grade, yield grade, and carcass weight of beef cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 927 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. T. Waylan, J. D. Dunn, B. J. Johnson, J. P. Kayser, and E. K. Sissom
Effect of flax supplementation and growth promotants on lipoprotein lipase and glycogenin messenger RNA concentrations in finishing cattle
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1868 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Scheffler, D. D. Buskirk, S. R. Rust, J. D. Cowley, and M. E. Doumit
Effect of repeated administration of combination trenbolone acetate and estradiol implants on growth, carcass traits, and beef quality of long-fed Holstein steers
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2395 - 2400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Reiling and D. D. Johnson
Effects of implant regimens (trenbolone acetate-estradiol administered alone or in combination with zeranol) and vitamin D3 on fresh beef color and quality
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 135 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.