|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 2 358-364, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
J. C. Emile, S. Bony and M. Ghesquiere
Genetique et Amelioration des Plantes Fourrageres, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Lusignan, France. emile@lusignan.inra.fr
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate performance and physiological responses of heifers and lambs to Neotyphodium coenophialum-infested tall fescue hay fed under European rearing conditions. Endophyte-free (E-) or 100% endophyte-infested (E+) hay was derived from the same cultivar (cv. Clarine) so that the effect of the endophytic fungus could be clearly separated from a possible cultivar effect. In Exp. 1, starting in June 1996, 20 age- and body weight-paired Holstein dairy heifers were assigned for 97 d to one of two treatments consisting of ad libitum access to either E- or E+ hay, corresponding to 0 and .41 mg/kg ergovaline, respectively. During the experimental period, no significant difference (P>.20) in forage consumption, rectal temperature, or behavioral status of the animals was observed between the two treatments. The E+ diet induced a 10% apparent decrease in ADG and a clear reduction in prolactin (PRL) plasma concentration compared to the E- diet. When animals were all reassigned to a common endophyte-free diet, the E+ group recovered body weight and PRL to levels similar to those in animals fed E- after 7 wk. In Exp. 2, 30 Texel ram lambs were assigned to two treatments consisting of dietary E- or E+ tall fescue hay. The E- and E+ hays were harvested from the same plots as used in Exp. 1 and contained 0 and .96 mg/kg ergovaline, respectively. No effect of the endophyte was found on intake or carcass or testicle weight (P>.20) after the 95-d feeding period. The E+ treatment resulted in a slight reduction in BW at slaughter, mainly explained by a lower ruminal fill (P<.01). In E+ treated animals, prolactin concentrations dropped significantly (P<.001) from d 27. Hay assessment in both experiments showed no difference in chemical composition and IVDMD. The endophytic fungus strongly lowered the palatability of the E+ hay, although there was no effect on intake with heifers (Exp. 1) or with lambs (Exp. 2). The potential of severe heat stress, as expressed by the temperature humidity index, was not high in our experimental conditions, although they were considered rather unusually stressful for the western part of northern Europe. Yet, no economic effect on cattle was observed, in disagreement with results obtained in many previous U.S. studies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Burns and D. S. Fisher Intake and Digestion of 'Jesup' Tall Fescue Hays with a Novel Fungal Endophyte, without an Endophyte, or with a Wild-Type Endophyte Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 216 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Matthews, M. H. Poore, G. B. Huntington, and J. T. Green Intake, digestion, and N metabolism in steers fed endophyte-free, ergot alkaloid-producing endophyte-infected, or nonergot alkaloid-producing endophyte-infected fescue hay J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 1179 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Browning Jr. Effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue on indicators of thermal status and growth in Hereford and Senepol steers J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 634 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Fieser and E. S. Vanzant Interactions between supplement energy source and tall fescue hay maturity on forage utilization by beef steers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 307 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Asay, K. B. Jensen, B. L. Waldron, G. Han, D. A. Johnson, and T. A. Monaco Forage Quality of Tall Fescue across an Irrigation Gradient Agron. J., November 1, 2002; 94(6): 1337 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Phillips, S. C. Rao, J. Q. Fitch, and H. S. Mayeux Digestibility and dry matter intake of diets containing alfalfa and kenaf J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2989 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |