J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Harland, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Harland, R.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 11 2778-2783, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effects of active immunization against gnRH on testicular development, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics of beef bulls

R. B. Cook, J. D. Popp, J. P. Kastelic, S. Robbins and R. Harland
Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge.

The objective was to determine the effects of a recombinant fusion protein anti-GnRH vaccine on testicular development, feedlot performance, and carcass quality of beef bulls. Crossbred beef bulls (n = 58, average weight 306 kg, 9 mo of age), were randomly allocated to two groups and received either an anti-GnRH vaccine (GnRH) or placebo (Control) by intramuscular injection on d 0, 56, and 112. There were group effects (P < 0.01; as a percentage of Control) on testicular weight (53%), daily sperm production (40%), and epididymal sperm reserves (16%). There were group x time interactions (P < 0.0001) for scrotal circumference and serum testosterone concentrations; at slaughter, bulls in the GnRH group had a smaller (P < 0.05) scrotal circumference (28.3 vs 33.9 cm) and lower (P < 0.05) serum testosterone concentrations (2.2 vs 8.6 ng/mL) than those in the Control group. Average daily gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency were not different between treatments during the backgrounding phase (d 0 to 84). During the finishing phase (d 98 to 182), ADG was greater (P < 0.05) for bulls in the Control group (1.69 vs 1.42 kg/d), as was carcass weight (6.9%; P < 0.01). However, GnRH bulls had numerically better feed efficiency (6.12 vs 7.08 kg DMI/kg gain; P < 0.23) and shear force values for ribeye that were 16% lower (P < 0.14) than Control bulls, warranting further investigation. Vaccinating bulls against GnRH suppressed testicular function, with growth and carcass characteristics similar to that expected with steers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
E. N. T. Meeusen, J. Walker, A. Peters, P.-P. Pastoret, and G. Jungersen
Current Status of Veterinary Vaccines
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2007; 20(3): 489 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Hernandez, E. L. Zanella, R. Bogden, D. M. de Avila, C. T. Gaskins, and J. J. Reeves
Reproductive characteristics of grass-fed, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-immunocastrated Bos indicus bulls
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2901 - 2907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Stevens, J. M. Sosa, D. M. deAvila, J. M. Oatley, K. P. Bertrand, C. T. Gaskins, and J. J. Reeves
Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone fusion protein vaccines block estrous cycle activity in beef heifers
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. O. Price, T. E. Adams, C. C. Huxsoll, and R. E. Borgwardt
Aggressive behavior is reduced in bulls actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 411 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. Aissat, J. M. Sosa, D. M. de Avila, K. P. Bertrand, and J. J. Reeves
Endocrine, growth, and carcass characteristics of bulls immunized against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone fusion proteins
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2209 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.