J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wulf, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Page, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wulf, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Page, J. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 10 2595-2607, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Using measurements of muscle color, pH, and electrical impedance to augment the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups

D. M. Wulf and J. K. Page
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1095, USA. duane_wulf@sdstate.edu

This research was conducted to determine whether objective measures of muscle color, muscle pH, and(or) electrical impedance are useful in segregating palatable beef from unpalatable beef, and to determine whether the current USDA quality grading standards for beef carcasses could be revised to improve their effectiveness at distinguishing palatable from unpalatable beef. One hundred beef carcasses were selected from packing plants in Texas, Illinois, and Ohio to represent the full range of muscle color observed in the U.S. beef carcass population. Steaks from these 100 carcasses were used to determine shear force on eight cooked beef muscles and taste panel ratings on three cooked beef muscles. It was discovered that the darkest-colored 20 to 25% of the beef carcasses sampled were less palatable and considerably less consistent than the other 75 to 80% sampled. Marbling score, by itself, explained 12% of the variation in beef palatability; hump height, by itself, explained 8% of the variation in beef palatability; measures of muscle color or pH, by themselves, explained 15 to 23% of the variation in beef palatability. When combined together, marbling score, hump height, and some measure of muscle color or pH explained 36 to 46% of the variation in beef palatability. Alternative quality grading systems were proposed to improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups. The two proposed grading systems decreased palatability variation by 29% and 39%, respectively, within the Choice grade and decreased palatability variation by 37% and 12%, respectively, within the Select grade, when compared with current USDA standards. The percentage of unpalatable Choice carcasses was reduced from 14% under the current USDA grading standards to 4% and 1%, respectively, for the two proposed systems. The percentage of unpalatable Select carcasses was reduced from 36% under the current USDA standards to 7% and 29%, respectively, for the proposed systems. These grading systems, which included requirements for maturity, marbling, hump height, and colorimeter readings, could be implemented into the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting beef carcasses into palatability groups. At the least, measurements of muscle color or pH could be used in a branded-beef program to increase the palatability consistency of its beef products.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. M. Price, G. G. Hilton, D. L. VanOverbeke, and J. B. Morgan
Using the near-infrared system to sort various beef middle and end muscle cuts into tenderness categories
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 413 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. R. Rust, D. M. Price, J. Subbiah, G. Kranzler, G. G. Hilton, D. L. Vanoverbeke, and J. B. Morgan
Predicting beef tenderness using near-infrared spectroscopy
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. S. Kuber, J. R. Busboom, E. Huff-Lonergan, S. K. Duckett, P. S. Mir, Z. Mir, R. J. McCormick, M. V. Dodson, C. T. Gaskins, J. D. Cronrath, et al.
Effects of biological type and dietary fat treatment on factors associated with tenderness: I. Measurements on beef longissimus muscle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 770 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. G. Riley, C. C. Chase Jr., T. D. Pringle, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, T. A. Olson, A. C. Hammond, and S. W. Coleman
Effect of sire on {micro}- and m-calpain activity and rate of tenderization as indicated by myofibril fragmentation indices of steaks from Brahman cattle
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2440 - 2447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. M. Wyle, D. J. Vote, D. L. Roeber, R. C. Cannell, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, M. Goldberg, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith
Effectiveness of the SmartMV prototype BeefCam System to sort beef carcasses into expected palatability groups
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. J. Vote, K. E. Belk, J. D. Tatum, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith
Online prediction of beef tenderness using a computer vision system equipped with a BeefCam module
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 457 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Wheeler, D. Vote, J. M. Leheska, S. D. Shackelford, K. E. Belk, D. M. Wulf, B. L. Gwartney, and M. Koohmaraie
The efficacy of three objective systems for identifying beef cuts that can be guaranteed tender
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3315 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. M. Wulf, R. S. Emnett, J. M. Leheska, and S. J. Moeller
Relationships among glycolytic potential, dark cutting (dark, firm, and dry) beef, and cooked beef palatability
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1895 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.