J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, J. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 78, Issue 10 2540-2546, Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Relationship between a bull's parental genetic merit difference and subsequent progeny trait variability in Angus, Gelbvieh, and Limousin cattle

K. D. Bullock, F. A. Thrift, D. K. Aaron and J. K. Bertrand
Animal Sciences Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546, USA. dbullock@ca.uky.edu

Data from the American Angus Association, American Gelbvieh Association, and the North American Limousin Foundation were analyzed to determine whether parental genetic differences are associated with Mendelian sampling of their bull progeny or with Mendelian sampling variances and weight variances of their bull progeny's offspring. Parental differences were measured as the difference between the parents' EPD for birth weight (DIF(BW)), weaning weight direct (DIF(WW)), and yearling weight (DIF(YW)). A bull's data were used if both parents had calculated EPD and the bull had at least 25 progeny with records for the specific trait. Traits calculated for each bull were his Mendelian sampling (MS(Bull)), progeny Mendelian sampling variance (MSsigma2progeny), progeny weight variance (WTsigma2), and progeny corrected weight variance (CWTsigma2 = adjusted weight minus appropriate dam EPD) for birth, weaning, and yearling weights. Pearson correlations were computed between DIF(BW), DIF(WW), and DIF(YW) and MS(Bull), MSsigma2progeny, WTsigma2, and CWTsigma2 for each trait, within each breed. Across breeds, the correlations ranged from -.07 to .11 for MS(Bull) .01 to .14 for MSsigma2progeny, -.06 to .09 for WTsigma2, and -.06 to .08 for CWTsigma2. Although some of the correlations were significantly different from zero their relatively small magnitude indicates little relationship between parental differences in genetic merit and subsequent offspring variability for each of the three breeds.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Animal Science.