HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schillo, K. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schillo, K. K.

An Appropriate Role for Ethics in Teaching Contemporary Issues¹

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215

Abstract

There seems to be general agreement among animal scientists that training in contemporary issues is an appropriate goal of animal science curricula. One approach is based on the view that public policy issues embody moral dilemmas that arise when the moral perspectives (values) of opposing groups are incompatible. Based on this view, an understanding of such issues requires some training in ethics. More specifically, knowledge of major moral theories and the nature of values is necessary to identify and analyze the moral components of issues. An appreciation for ethics also provides insight into addressing issues in a morally responsible manner. The plurality of values and the contextual nature of policy issues precludes solutions based on application of universal moral principles. Nevertheless, informed judgments, based on the collective wisdom of individuals, frequently offer solutions that address opposing values. Such judgments can be attained when those affected by issues form communities, attempt to achieve a collective understanding of the problem, and, if possible, construct a common set of values that facilitates consensus. Based on this analysis, issues courses should facilitate the development of learning communities wherein students and teachers critically analyze (i.e., deconstruct) and reconstruct issues in ways that enhance understanding and instill a respect for diverse moral perspectives. An expression of such understanding and respect is the ability to distinguish between situations when consensus offers fair solutions and when it subjects minority groups to the tyranny of the majority.

¹ Published with the approval of the Director of the Kentucky Agric. Exp. Sta. as publication no. 99-07-90.

² Telephone: 606/257-7512; fax: 606/257-3412; E-mail: KKSCHI1{at}pop.uky.edu.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. K. Schillo and P. B. Thompson Postmodernism for animal scientists J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 2989 - 2994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Arthington and F. M. Pate Effect of corn- vs molasses-based supplements on trace mineral status in beef heifers J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2787 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]