J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhart, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhart, G. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 8 2180-2186, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of selected high-starch flours as ingredients in canine diets

S. M. Murray, G. C. Fahey Jr, N. R. Merchen, G. D. Sunvold and G. A. Reinhart
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

Cereal grains represent 30 to 60% of the DM of many companion animal diets. Once incorporated into a diet, the starch component of these grains can provide an excellent source of ME. However, crystallinity and form of starch are variable and can cause incomplete digestion within the gastrointestinal tract. Diets fed in this experiment included one of six high-starch flours as the main source of carbohydrate. The flours originated from barley, corn, potato, rice, sorghum, and wheat. The diets were extruded and kibbled. Starch fraction concentrations of flours consisted of nearly 100% rapidly digestible starch (RDS) and slowly digestible starch (SDS) combined. Starch fraction concentrations of diets paralleled concentrations in flours. Flours varied widely in concentrations of CP, fat, starch, and total dietary fiber. Ileal OM and CP digestibilities were lowest for the potato flour treatment (74 and 64%, respectively). Ileal and total tract starch digestibilities were different (P<.05) among treatments; however, the starch component of all diets was nearly completely digested (>99%). Total tract digestibility of DM and OM was lowest for sorghum (80 and 84%, respectively) compared to all other diets. Crude protein digestibility was highest for corn (87%). Wet fecal weights tended (P<.08) to be greatest for dogs fed the barley treatment (175 g/d). However, dry fecal weights (dried at 55 degrees C) were greatest for dogs consuming the sorghum diet (51 g/d). Fecal scores were consistently greater (i.e., looser stools) for the barley treatment. Any of these flours could be used without negative effects on digestion at either the ileum or in the total tract. Fecal consistency data for dogs consuming the barley treatment indicate that diets containing large amounts (>50%) of barley may not be advantageous for dog owners who house their animals indoors for most of the day.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. N. Twomey, D. W. Pethick, J. B. Rowe, M. Choct, J. R. Pluske, W. Brown, and M. C. Laviste
The Use of Sorghum and Corn as Alternatives to Rice in Dog Foods
J. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 132(6): 1704S - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. M. Burkhalter, N. R. Merchen, L. L. Bauer, S. M. Murray, A. R. Patil, J. L. Brent Jr., and G. C. Fahey Jr.
The Ratio of Insoluble to Soluble Fiber Components in Soybean Hulls Affects Ileal and Total-Tract Nutrient Digestibilities and Fecal Characteristics of Dogs
J. Nutr., July 1, 2001; 131(7): 1978 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. E. Bednar, A. R. Patil, S. M. Murray, C. M. Grieshop, N. R. Merchen, and G. C. Fahey Jr.
Starch and Fiber Fractions in Selected Food and Feed Ingredients Affect Their Small Intestinal Digestibility and Fermentability and Their Large Bowel Fermentability In Vitro in a Canine Model
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 276 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Animal Science.