J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varona, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varona, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, J. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 8 1994-2002, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Threshold-linear versus linear-linear analysis of birth weight and calving ease using an animal model: I. Variance component estimation

L. Varona, I. Misztal and J. K. Bertrand
Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.

Birth weight and calving difficulty were analyzed with Bayesian methodology using univariate linear models, a bivariate linear model, a threshold model for calving difficulty, and a joint threshold-linear model using a probit approach. Field data included 26,006 records of Gelbvieh cattle. Simulated populations were generated using parameters estimated from the field data. The Gibbs sampler was used to obtain estimates of the marginal posterior mean and standard deviation of the (co)variance components, heritabilities, and correlations. In the univariate analyses, the posterior mean of direct heritability for calving difficulty was .23 with the threshold model and .18 with the linear model. Maternal heritabilities were .10 and .08, respectively. In the bivariate analysis, posterior means of direct heritability for calving difficulty were .21 and .18 for the bivariate linear-threshold and linear-linear model, respectively. Maternal heritabilities were .09 and .06, respectively. Direct heritability for birth weight was .25 for the univariate model and .26 for bivariate models. Maternal heritability was .05 for the linear-threshold model and the univariate model and .06 for the bivariate linear model. Genetic correlation between direct genetic effects in both traits was .81 for the linear-threshold model and .79 for the bivariate linear. Residual correlation was .35 for the bivariate linear model and .50 for the bivariate linear-threshold. A simulation study confirmed that the posterior mean of the marginal distribution was suitable as a point estimate for univariate threshold and bivariate linear-threshold models.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. Gutierrez, F. Goyache, I. Fernandez, I. Alvarez, and L. J. Royo
Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight, and weaning weight in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 69 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Albera, A. F. Groen, and P. Carnier
Genetic relationships between calving performance and beef production traits in Piemontese cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3440 - 3446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
F. Abeni, G. Bergoglio, G. Masoero, G. M. Terzano, and S. Allegrini
Plasma hormones and metabolites in Piedmontese cows during late pregnancy: Relationships with calf birth weight
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 438 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
F. Phocas and D. Laloe
Evaluation models and genetic parameters for calving difficulty in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 933 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Animal Science.