J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appel, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lundeheim, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appel, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lundeheim, N.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 7 1666-1678, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Culling before testing in swine: identification of culling strategy and estimation of culling precision

L. J. Appel, E. Strandberg, B. Danell and N. Lundeheim
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

The aim of this simulation study was to identify culling strategy and to estimate culling precision based on various characteristics available in field data in order to evaluate the ability to detect situations in which adjustment for missing data should be applied in genetic evaluation. Data were simulated for age at 100 kg of live weight (AGE) measured on the farm. Culling was done within (C-W/IN) or over (C-OVER) litters by deleting records from the simulated datasets with culling intensities of .33 and .67. The culling variate (CVAR) used indicated the culling precision and had genetic and phenotypic correlations of 1.00, .75, .50, .25, or .00 with AGE (r(CVAR,AGE)). We were able to distinguish between culling strategies C-OVER and C-W/IN by means of decision rules based on proportion of tested animals per litter. Estimates of r(CVAR,AGE) were obtained from calibration curves for linear regression coefficients of litter average or within-litter variance for AGE on proportion of tested animals, and within- and between-litter variance (V(W) and V(B)) for AGE. Moderate to high r(CVAR,AGE) could be identified with little error by using V(W) or V(B) in C-W/IN and V(W) in C-OVER. Within-litter variance and the weighted average of the estimates from all four characteristics were well able to detect r(CVAR,AGE) values of .50 and higher in both C-W/IN and C-OVER. In conclusion, characteristics of swine field data with missing observations contain information that makes it possible to determine culling strategy, intensity, and precision. This information can be used to decide whether missing data should be replaced by their expected values in genetic evaluation.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Animal Science.