J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, S. P.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 7 1654-1658, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs, using placental efficiency as a selection tool

M. E. Wilson, N. J. Biensen and S. P. Ford
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

Chinese Meishan pigs produce three to five more pigs per litter than less-prolific U.S. or European pig breeds as a result of a markedly decreased placental size and an increased pig weight: placental weight ratio (placental efficiency). We hypothesized that as a result of their intense selection for prolificacy, the Chinese had indirectly selected for a smaller, more efficient placenta in the Meishan breed. The goals of this study were to determine whether 1) significant variation in placental size and efficiency existed within our population of purebred Yorkshire pigs and 2) selection of pigs (boars and gilts) based on clear differences in placental size and efficiency would affect litter size. There was significant (approximately threefold) variation in placental efficiency in our herd of Yorkshire pigs, and marked (approximately twofold) variation existed within individual litters. We then selected pigs (boars and gilts) that had either a higher (A Group) or lower (B Group) than average placental efficiency. Although the birth weights of selected A Group pigs were similar to those of the B Group pigs, they had markedly smaller placentae. Males from each group (A or B) were bred to the females of the same group, and farrowing data were collected from parities 1 and 2. In both parities, A Group females farrowed more live pigs per litter than did B Group females (12.5 +/- .7 vs 9.6 +/- .5, P < .05). Although A Group pigs were on average approximately 20% lighter than B group pigs (1.2 +/- .1 vs 1.5 +/- .1 kg, P < .05), their placentae were approximately 40% lighter (250 +/- 10 vs 347 +/- 15 g, P < .01), resulting in a marked increase in placental efficiency. The results of this study suggest that selection on placental size and efficiency may provide a valuable tool for optimizing litter size in commercially important pig breeds.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. Ocak, E. Emsen, F. Koycegiz, M. Kutluca, and H. Onder
Comparison of placental traits and their relation to litter size and parity weight in sheep
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3196 - 3201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rosendo, L. Canario, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel
Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3209 - 3217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Vallet and B. A. Freking
Differences in placental structure during gestation associated with large and small pig fetuses
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3267 - 3275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. Tayade, Y. Fang, D. Hilchie, and B. A. Croy
Lymphocyte contributions to altered endometrial angiogenesis during early and midgestation fetal loss
J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2007; 82(4): 877 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Freking, K. A. Leymaster, J. L. Vallet, and R. K. Christenson
Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2093 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, L. Canario, and J. P. Bidanel
Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1615 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel
Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 356 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Canario, E. Cantoni, E. Le Bihan, J. C. Caritez, Y. Billon, J. P. Bidanel, and J. L. Foulley
Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3185 - 3196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. M. Cammack, R. L. Weaber, and W. R. Lamberson
Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Cammack, and W. R. Lamberson
Selection for placental efficiency in swine: Genetic parameters and trends
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 983 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Costine, E. K. Inskeep, and M. E. Wilson
Growth hormone at breeding modifies conceptus development and postnatal growth in sheep
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 810 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. A. Vonnahme and S. P. Ford
Differential Expression of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Receptor System in the Gravid Uterus of Yorkshire and Meishan Pigs
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
K. A. Vonnahme and S. P. Ford
Placental vascular endothelial growth factor receptor system mRNA expression in pigs selected for placental efficiency
J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 194 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. H. King, Z. Jiang, J. P. Gibson, C. S. Haley, and A. L. Archibald
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Female Reproductive Traits on Porcine Chromosome 8
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2172 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Argente, M. A. Santacreu, A. Climent, and A. Blasco
Relationships between uterine and fetal traits in rabbits selected on uterine capacity
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1265 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Engelhardt, B. A. Croy, and G. J. King
Conceptus Influences the Distribution of Uterine Leukocytes During Early Porcine Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2002; 66(6): 1875 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Engelhardt, B. A. Croy, and G. J. King
Evaluation of Natural Killer Cell Recruitment to Embryonic Attachment Sites During Early Porcine Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1185 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Animal Science.