Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 7 1654-1658, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs, using placental efficiency as a selection tool

M. E. Wilson, N. J. Biensen and S. P. Ford
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

Chinese Meishan pigs produce three to five more pigs per litter than less-prolific U.S. or European pig breeds as a result of a markedly decreased placental size and an increased pig weight: placental weight ratio (placental efficiency). We hypothesized that as a result of their intense selection for prolificacy, the Chinese had indirectly selected for a smaller, more efficient placenta in the Meishan breed. The goals of this study were to determine whether 1) significant variation in placental size and efficiency existed within our population of purebred Yorkshire pigs and 2) selection of pigs (boars and gilts) based on clear differences in placental size and efficiency would affect litter size. There was significant (approximately threefold) variation in placental efficiency in our herd of Yorkshire pigs, and marked (approximately twofold) variation existed within individual litters. We then selected pigs (boars and gilts) that had either a higher (A Group) or lower (B Group) than average placental efficiency. Although the birth weights of selected A Group pigs were similar to those of the B Group pigs, they had markedly smaller placentae. Males from each group (A or B) were bred to the females of the same group, and farrowing data were collected from parities 1 and 2. In both parities, A Group females farrowed more live pigs per litter than did B Group females (12.5 +/- .7 vs 9.6 +/- .5, P < .05). Although A Group pigs were on average approximately 20% lighter than B group pigs (1.2 +/- .1 vs 1.5 +/- .1 kg, P < .05), their placentae were approximately 40% lighter (250 +/- 10 vs 347 +/- 15 g, P < .01), resulting in a marked increase in placental efficiency. The results of this study suggest that selection on placental size and efficiency may provide a valuable tool for optimizing litter size in commercially important pig breeds.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Rosendo, L. Canario, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3209 - 3217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Vallet and B. A. Freking Differences in placental structure during gestation associated with large and small pig fetuses J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3267 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Tayade, Y. Fang, D. Hilchie, and B. A. Croy Lymphocyte contributions to altered endometrial angiogenesis during early and midgestation fetal loss J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2007; 82(4): 877 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Freking, K. A. Leymaster, J. L. Vallet, and R. K. Christenson Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2093 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, L. Canario, and J. P. Bidanel Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1615 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 356 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Canario, E. Cantoni, E. Le Bihan, J. C. Caritez, Y. Billon, J. P. Bidanel, and J. L. Foulley Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3185 - 3196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. M. Cammack, R. L. Weaber, and W. R. Lamberson Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Cammack, and W. R. Lamberson Selection for placental efficiency in swine: Genetic parameters and trends J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Costine, E. K. Inskeep, and M. E. Wilson Growth hormone at breeding modifies conceptus development and postnatal growth in sheep J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 810 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Vonnahme and S. P. Ford Differential Expression of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Receptor System in the Gravid Uterus of Yorkshire and Meishan Pigs Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Vonnahme and S. P. Ford Placental vascular endothelial growth factor receptor system mRNA expression in pigs selected for placental efficiency J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 194 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. King, Z. Jiang, J. P. Gibson, C. S. Haley, and A. L. Archibald Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Female Reproductive Traits on Porcine Chromosome 8 Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2172 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Argente, M. A. Santacreu, A. Climent, and A. Blasco Relationships between uterine and fetal traits in rabbits selected on uterine capacity J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1265 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Engelhardt, B. A. Croy, and G. J. King Conceptus Influences the Distribution of Uterine Leukocytes During Early Porcine Pregnancy Biol Reprod, June 1, 2002; 66(6): 1875 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Engelhardt, B. A. Croy, and G. J. King Evaluation of Natural Killer Cell Recruitment to Embryonic Attachment Sites During Early Porcine Pregnancy Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1185 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]