Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 5 1266-1276, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of supplemental alfalfa quality on the intake, use, and subsequent performance of beef cattle consuming low-quality roughages

C. E. Weder, T. DelCurto, T. Svejcar, J. R. Jaeger and R. K. Bailey
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Union 97883, USA.

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate influences of supplemental alfalfa quality on intake and use of low-quality meadow grass roughages (MG) by beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 15 steers (250 kg) were assigned to three treatments: 1) MG (5.2% CP), no supplement; 2) MG plus high-quality alfalfa (18.8% CP); and 3) MG plus low-quality alfalfa (15.2% CP). High- and low-quality alfalfa supplements were fed at .45 and .55% BW, respectively. Total DMI was greater (P < .01) for alfalfa-supplemented steers than for MG. Likewise, intake of digestible DM, DM digestibility (DMD), and ruminal ammonia level were greater (P < .01) for supplemented steers. In Exp. 2, 96 pregnant Hereford x Simmental cows (537 kg; body condition [BC] score 4.86) were assigned to the same treatments as in Exp. 1. For d 0 to 42, cows grazed on 19.1 ha of stockpiled MG (4,539 kg/ha; 6.8% CP), whereas, on d 43 to 84, cows received MG hay (5.2% CP). Supplemented cows gained more BW (P < .01), BC score (P < .01), and had heavier calf birth weight (P < .01) than nonsupplemented cows. However, there were no treatment effects (P > .10) on cow cyclicity, pregnancy rate, or calving interval. In Exp. 3, 90 pregnant Angus x Hereford cows (475 kg; BC score 4.59) were assigned to three treatments: 16.1%, 17.8% or 20.0% CP alfalfa supplement, with levels of .63, .55, and .50% of BW, respectively. Weight gain and BC score for the 84-d study displayed a quadratic response (P < .10), yet represented only 7 kg BW and .2 units of BC score. In conclusion, alfalfa hay supplementation was effective in increasing DMI and digestibility. However, alfalfa hay quality did not dramatically affect BW, BC score, and(or) calf birth weight, when fed on an isonitrogenous basis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. W. Hess, S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, T. R. Weston, V. Nayigihugu, J. D. C. Molle, and G. E. Moss Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E90 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Currier, D. W. Bohnert, S. J. Falck, C. S. Schauer, and S. J. Bartle Daily and alternate-day supplementation of urea or biuret to ruminants consuming low-quality forage: III. Effects on ruminal fermentation characteristics in steers J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1528 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Bohnert, C. S. Schauer, S. J. Falck, and T. DelCurto Influence of rumen protein degradability and supplementation frequency on steers consuming low-quality forage: II. Ruminal fermentation characteristics J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2978 - 2988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Phillips, S. C. Rao, J. Q. Fitch, and H. S. Mayeux Digestibility and dry matter intake of diets containing alfalfa and kenaf J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2989 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]