Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 5 1113-1119, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Physiological changes and digestive capabilities of newly received feedlot cattle

S. C. Loerch and F. L. Fluharty
Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center and The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA.

Newly arrived feedlot calves undergo numerous stressors that result in 1) transient endocrine responses, 2) altered products of energy and protein metabolism, 3) changes in appetite and growth rate, 4) possible limited compromise of digestive and rumen function, and 5) a challenged immune system. The most consistent endocrine and metabolic responses to marketing, transport, and feedlot adaptation are seen with cortisol and epinephrine. In contrast to earlier work done with indirect in vitro gas production measurements, recent research has shown that the ruminal microbial population is able to effectively digest available substrate immediately following a calfs weaning, trucking, and 24 h of feed and water deprivation. Additionally, a period of feed and water deprivation up to 72 h coupled with 8 h of trucking does not reduce the concentration or total numbers of either the viable cellulolytic or total bacteria present in the rumen of newly weaned or feedlot-adapted calves. However, ruminal volume, DM, total weight of ruminal contents, and total protozoal numbers decrease as duration of feed deprivation increases. To compensate for the reduced DMI that occurs in the first 2 wk after arrival at the feedlot, increased nutrient density is needed to meet an animal's requirements for nutrients. Limited data suggest that newly arrived calves prefer a diet that is similar in moisture and texture to feeds with which they are familiar. Additionally, modification of the stress-associated behavior using trainer animals may improve the feed intake of newly received calves and may reduce calf morbidity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. B. Farran, C. D. Reinhardt, D. A. Blasi, J. E. Minton, T. H. Elsasser, J. J. Higgins, and J. S. Drouillard Source of dietary lipid may modify the immune response in stressed feeder cattle J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1382 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Richeson, P. A. Beck, M. S. Gadberry, S. A. Gunter, T. W. Hess, D. S. Hubbell III, and C. Jones Effects of on-arrival versus delayed modified live virus vaccination on health, performance, and serum infectious bovine rhinotracheitis titers of newly received beef calves J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 999 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Brown, C. H. Ponce, and R. Pulikanti Adaptation of beef cattle to high-concentrate diets: Performance and ruminal metabolism J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E25 - E. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Timmerman, L. Mulder, H. Everts, D. C. van Espen, E. van der Wal, G. Klaassen, S. M. G. Rouwers, R. Hartemink, F. M. Rombouts, and A. C. Beynen Health and Growth of Veal Calves Fed Milk Replacers With or Without Probiotics J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2154 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. E. Pinchak, D. R. Tolleson, M. McCloy, L. J. Hunt, R. J. Gill, R. J. Ansley, and S. J. Bevers Morbidity effects on productivity and profitability of stocker cattle grazing in the Southern Plains J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2773 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]