Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 5 1093-1099, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of imposed feed intake variation on acidosis and performance of finishing steers

R. J. Cooper, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. A. Stock, C. T. Milton, D. W. Herold and J. C. Parrott
University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.

Four metabolism and two finishing trials were conducted to determine the effects of imposed feed intake variation on acidosis and performance of finishing steers. In Metabolism Trial 1, four ruminally fistulated steers were limit-fed and subjected to either a constant amount of feed per day (C) or low intake variation of .7 kg/d (LV). No treatment differences were found for intake or measures of acidosis. Metabolism Trial 2 was conducted similarly to Metabolism Trial 1 with treatments of C and high intake variation of 1.4 kg/d (HV). Treatment HV increased (P < .05) acidosis, as indicated by the area of ruminal pH below 5.6. In Metabolism Trial 3, four steers were fed at ad libitum levels of intake and subjected to three levels of intake variation: ad libitum intake with no imposed intake variation (AL), LV of .7 kg/d, and HV of 1.4 kg/d. No treatment differences were found. In Metabolism Trial 4, six ruminally fistulated steers were fed at ad libitum levels and subjected to three levels of intake variation: AL, LV of .9 kg/d, and HV of 1.8 kg/d. Average ruminal pH increased (P < .05) and area of ruminal pH below 5.6 decreased (P < .05) as level of intake variation was increased. In Finishing Trial 1, 75 steers were assigned to eight pens and two treatments: AL or HV of 1.8 kg/d. Dry matter intake increased (P < .05) from AL to HV. Daily gain and gain/feed were not affected by treatment. In Finishing Trial 2, 94 steers were assigned to 12 pens and two treatments: AL or HV of 1.8 kg/d. No treatment differences were noted in DMI, daily gain, or gain/ feed. Therefore, results of these trials indicate that intake variation of up to 1.8 kg/d does not increase acidosis or decrease performance of finishing steers fed at ad libitum levels of intake.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Cerrato-Sanchez, S. Calsamiglia, and A. Ferret Effect of the magnitude of the decrease of rumen pH on rumen fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture system J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 378 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Loy, J. C. MacDonald, T. J. Klopfenstein, and G. E. Erickson Effect of distillers grains or corn supplementation frequency on forage intake and digestibility J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2625 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cerrato-Sanchez, S. Calsamiglia, and A. Ferret Effects of Patterns of Suboptimal pH on Rumen Fermentation in a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4368 - 4377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Nagaraja and E. C. Titgemeyer Ruminal Acidosis in Beef Cattle: The Current Microbiological and Nutritional Outlook J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(13_suppl): E17 - E38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. N. Gozho, D. O. Krause, and J. C. Plaizier Ruminal Lipopolysaccharide Concentration and Inflammatory Response During Grain-Induced Subacute Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 856 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. AlZahal, B. Rustomo, N. E. Odongo, T. F. Duffield, and B. W. McBride Technical note: A system for continuous recording of ruminal pH in cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 213 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. N. Gozho, D. O. Krause, and J. C. Plaizier Rumen lipopolysaccharide and inflammation during grain adaptation and subacute ruminal acidosis in steers. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4404 - 4413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Jaeger, M. K. Luebbe, C. N. Macken, G. E. Erickson, T. J. Klopfenstein, W. A. Fithian, and D. S. Jackson Influence of corn hybrid traits on digestibility and the efficiency of gain in feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1790 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rotger, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, J. L. R. de la Torre, and S. Calsamiglia Effects of dietary nonstructural carbohydrates and protein sources on feeding behavior of tethered heifers fed high-concentrate diets J Anim Sci, May 1, 2006; 84(5): 1197 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Shah and M. R. Murphy Development and Evaluation of Models to Predict the Feed Intake of Dairy Cows in Early Lactation J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 294 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. A. Beauchemin, T. A. McAllister, D. J. Gibb, M. Streeter, and A. D. Kennedy Effect of feed delivery fluctuations and feeding time on ruminal acidosis, growth performance, and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3357 - 3365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Erickson, C. T. Milton, K. C. Fanning, R. J. Cooper, R. S. Swingle, J. C. Parrott, G. Vogel, and T. J. Klopfenstein Interaction between bunk management and monensin concentration on finishing performance, feeding behavior, and ruminal metabolism during an acidosis challenge with feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2869 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. A. Beauchemin, D. J. Gibb, D. H. Crews Jr., D. D. Hickman, M. Streeter, and T. A. McAllister Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: A review J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]