J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dodenhoff, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dodenhoff, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, K. E.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 4 840-845, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Estimation of direct, maternal, and grandmaternal genetic effects for weaning weight in several breeds of beef cattle

J. Dodenhoff, L. D. Van Vleck and K. E. Gregory
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.

Weaning weights from nine parental breeds and three composites were analyzed to estimate variance due to grandmaternal genetic effects and to compare estimates for variance due to maternal genetic effects from two different models. Number of observations ranged from 794 to 3,465 per population. Number of animals in the pedigree file ranged from 1,244 to 4,326 per population. Two single-trait animal models were used to obtain estimates of covariance components by REML using an average information method. Model 1 included random direct and maternal genetic, permanent maternal environmental, and residual environmental effects as well as fixed sex x year and age of dam effects. Model 2 in addition included random grandmaternal genetic and permanent grandmaternal environmental effects to account for maternal effects of a cow on her daughter's maternal ability. Non-zero estimates of proportion of variance due to grandmaternal effects were obtained for 7 of the 12 populations and ranged from .03 to .06. Direct heritability estimates in these populations were similar with both models. Existence of variance due to grandmaternal effects did not affect the estimates of maternal heritability (m2) or the correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects (r(am)) for Angus and Gelbvieh. For the other five populations, magnitude of estimates increased for both m2 and r(am) when estimates of variance due to grandmaternal effects were not zero. Estimates of the correlation between maternal and grandmaternal genetic effects were large and negative. These results suggest that grand-maternal effects exist in some populations, that when such effects are ignored in analyses maternal heritability may be underestimated, and that the correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects may be biased downward if grandmaternal effects are not included in the model for weaning weight of beef cattle.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Gomez-Raya, K. Priest, W. M. Rauw, M. Okomo-Adhiambo, D. Thain, B. Bruce, A. Rink, R. Torell, L. Grellman, R. Narayanan, et al.
The value of DNA paternity identification in beef cattle: Examples from Nevada's free-range ranches
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. Iwaisaki, S. Tsuruta, I. Misztal, and J. K. Bertrand
Estimation of correlation between maternal permanent environmental effects of related dams in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 537 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. L. Sapp, R. Rekaya, and J. K. Bertrand
Teat scores in first-parity Gelbvieh cows: Relationship with suspensory score and calf growth traits
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2277 - 2284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Animal Science.