|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 2 430-439, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
A. L. Sutton, K. B. Kephart, M. W. Verstegen, T. T. Canh and P. J. Hobbs
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1026, USA.
Recent public concern about air pollution from pork production units has prompted more research to develop methods to reduce and control odors. Masking agents, enzymes and bacterial preparations, feed additives, chemicals, oxidation processes, air scrubbers, biofilters, and new ventilation systems have been studied. Research relating the effects of the swine diet on manure odors has been scarce. Introducing feed additives to bind ammonia, change digesta pH, affect specific enzyme activity, and mask odors has been either costly or not consistently successful. Recent research emphasis has focused on manipulating the diet 1) to increase the nutrient utilization of the diet to reduce excretion products, 2) to enhance microbial metabolism in the lower digestive tract to reduce excretion of odor-causing compounds, and 3) to change the physical characteristics of urine and feces to reduce odor emissions. Primary odor-causing compounds evolve from excess degradable proteins and lack of specific fermentable carbohydrates during microbial fermentation. Reductions in ammonia emissions by 28 to 79% through diet modifications have been reported. Limited research on reduction of other odorous volatile organic compounds through diet modifications is promising. Use of synthetic amino acids with reduced intact protein levels in diets significantly reduces nitrogen excretions and odor production. Addition of nonstarch polysaccharides and specific oligosaccharides further alters the pathway of nitrogen excretion and reduces odor emission. Continued nutritional and microbial research to incorporate protein degradation products, especially sulfur-containing organics, with fermentable carbohydrates in the lower gastrointestinal tract of pigs will further control odors from manure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Davis, T. Parrott, D. C. Brown, B. Z. de Rodas, Z. B. Johnson, C. V. Maxwell, and T. Rehberger Effect of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial feed supplement on growth performance and pen cleaning characteristics of growing-finishing pigs J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1459 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Eriksen, P. Sorensen, and L. Elsgaard The Fate of Sulfate in Acidified Pig Slurry during Storage and Following Application to Cropped Soil J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 280 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Archibeque, D. N. Miller, H. C. Freetly, E. D. Berry, and C. L. Ferrell The influence of oscillating dietary protein concentrations on finishing cattle. I. Feedlot performance and odorous compound production J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1487 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Htoo, W. C. Sauer, Y. Zhang, M. Cervantes, S. F. Liao, B. A. Araiza, A. Morales, and N. Torrentera The effect of feeding low-phytate barley-soybean meal diets differing in protein content to growing pigs on the excretion of phosphorus and nitrogen J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 700 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Le, A. J. A. Aarnink, A. W. Jongbloed, C. M. C. van der Peet Schwering, N. W. M. Ogink, and M. W. A. Verstegen Effects of crystalline amino acid supplementation to the diet on odor from pig manure J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 791 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Miller and B. L. Woodbury A Solid-Phase Microextraction Chamber Method for Analysis of Manure Volatiles J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 2383 - 2394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Panetta, W. J. Powers, H. Xin, B. J. Kerr, and K. J. Stalder Nitrogen excretion and ammonia emissions from pigs fed modified diets. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1297 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Kerr, C. J. Ziemer, S. L. Trabue, J. D. Crouse, and T. B. Parkin Manure composition of swine as affected by dietary protein and cellulose concentrations J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1584 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. G. Clark, S. Moehn, I. Edeogu, J. Price, and J. Leonard Manipulation of Dietary Protein and Nonstarch Polysaccharide to Control Swine Manure Emissions J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2005; 34(5): 1461 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Panetta, W. J. Powers, and J. C. Lorimor Management Strategy Impacts on Ammonia Volatilization from Swine Manure J. Environ. Qual., May 11, 2005; 34(3): 1119 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Armstrong, D. R. Cook, M. M. Ward, C. M. Williams, and J. W. Spears Effect of dietary copper source (cupric citrate and cupric sulfate) and concentration on growth performance and fecal copper excretion in weanling pigs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2004; 82(4): 1234 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Rotz Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E119 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Miller and V. H. Varel Swine manure composition affects the biochemical origins, composition, and accumulation of odorous compounds J Anim Sci, September 1, 2003; 81(9): 2131 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Otto, M. Yokoyama, S. Hengemuehle, R. D. von Bermuth, T. van Kempen, and N. L. Trottier Ammonia, volatile fatty acids, phenolics, and odor offensiveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1754 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Shriver, S. D. Carter, A. L. Sutton, B. T. Richert, B. W. Senne, and L. A. Pettey Effects of adding fiber sources to reduced-crude protein, amino acid-supplemented diets on nitrogen excretion, growth performance, and carcass traits of finishing pigs J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 492 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |