Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 11 2942-2950, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades

R. C. Cannell, J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, J. W. Wise, R. P. Clayton and G. C. Smith
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171, USA.

An improved ability to quantify differences in the fabrication yields of beef carcasses would facilitate the application of value-based marketing. This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the Dual-Component Australian VIASCAN to 1) predict fabricated beef subprimal yields as a percentage of carcass weight at each of three fat-trim levels and 2) augment USDA yield grading, thereby improving accuracy of grade placement. Steer and heifer carcasses (n = 240) were evaluated using VIASCAN, as well as by USDA expert and online graders, before fabrication of carcasses to each of three fat-trim levels. Expert yield grade (YG), online YG, VIASCAN estimates, and VIASCAN estimated ribeye area used to augment actual and expert grader estimates of the remaining YG factors (adjusted fat thickness, percentage of kidney-pelvic-heart fat, and hot carcass weight), respectively, 1) accounted for 51, 37, 46, and 55% of the variation in fabricated yields of commodity-trimmed subprimals, 2) accounted for 74, 54, 66, and 75% of the variation in fabricated yields of closely trimmed subprimals, and 3) accounted for 74, 54, 71, and 75% of the variation in fabricated yields of very closely trimmed subprimals. The VIASCAN system predicted fabrication yields more accurately than current online yield grading and, when certain VIASCAN-measured traits were combined with some USDA yield grade factors in an augmentation system, the accuracy of cutability prediction was improved, at packing plant line speeds, to a level matching that of expert graders applying grades at a comfortable rate.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Steiner, A. M. Wyle, D. J. Vote, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, J. W. Wise, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis J Anim Sci, September 1, 2003; 81(9): 2239 - 2246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Steiner, D. J. Vote, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, J. W. Wise, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith Accuracy and repeatability of beef carcass longissimus muscle area measurements J Anim Sci, August 1, 2003; 81(8): 1980 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Brady, K. E. Belk, S. B. LeValley, N. L. Dalsted, J. A. Scanga, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith An evaluation of the lamb vision system as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage J Anim Sci, June 1, 2003; 81(6): 1488 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, and M. Koohmaraie On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 150 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]