J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heldt, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nagaraja, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heldt, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nagaraja, T. G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 77, Issue 10 2793-2802, Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of different supplemental sugars and starch fed in combination with degradable intake protein on low-quality forage use by beef steers

J. S. Heldt, R. C. Cochran, G. L. Stokka, C. G. Farmer, C. P. Mathis, E. C. Titgemeyer and T. G. Nagaraja
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1600, USA.

Twenty ruminally fistulated steers (Exp. 1, 448 kg and Exp. 2, 450 kg) were used in two consecutive randomized complete block experiments with five treatments in each experiment. The purpose was to evaluate the impact of feeding different supplemental sugars or starch in combination with supplemental degradable intake protein (DIP) on the utilization of low-quality tallgrass-prairie hay. In Exp. 1, steers were given ad libitum access to forage and, except for the negative control (NC), received a limited supply (insufficient to maximize forage use) of supplemental DIP (.031% BW/d, DM basis). In addition to the NC, this experiment included four supplementation treatments in which one of four carbohydrate (CHO) sources (starch, glucose, fructose, or sucrose) was fed at .30% BW of DM/d. In Exp. 2, the treatment structure was identical except that the supplemental DIP level (.122% BW, DM basis) was near the level needed to maximize forage use. Forage OM intake (FOMI) was not affected (P> or =.26) by supplementation in Exp. 1 but was increased (P = .05) in Exp. 2. However, no difference (P> or =.46) in FOMI occurred among CHO sources in either experiment. Total OM and digestible OM intakes were increased (P<.01) by supplementation in both experiments. In Exp. 1, no difference (P>.26) in OM digestion (OMD) occurred among treatments. In Exp. 2, supplementation increased (P<.01) OMD. Additionally, sugars yielded a higher (P = .04) OMD than starch, and the monosaccharides yielded a higher (P = .02) OMD than sucrose. In Exp. 1, NDF digestion (NDFD) was decreased (P = .02) by supplementation, but no differences (P> or =.21) occurred among CHO sources. In Exp. 2, NDFD was increased (P = .03) by supplementation. Additionally, sugars led to higher (P = .05) NDFD than starch, and the monosaccharides led to higher (P = .03) NDFD than sucrose. In both experiments, discernible patterns were observable with regard to the effects of supplementation and type of supplemental CHO on ruminal fermentation characteristics. In conclusion, even though some consistency in fermentation profiles for different carbohydrate sources was evident in both experiments, forage intake and digestion responses were not consistent across experiments. This raises the possibility that carbohydrate source may interact with the amount of supplemental DIP fed and, as such, deserves additional investigation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. B. Hall and G. B. Huntington
Nutrient synchrony: Sound in theory, elusive in practice
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E287 - E292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Firkins, A. N. Hristov, M. B. Hall, G. A. Varga, and N. R. St-Pierre
Integration of Ruminal Metabolism in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E31 - E51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. E. Vallimont, F. Bargo, T. W. Cassidy, N. D. Luchini, G. A. Broderick, and G. A. Varga
Effects of Replacing Dietary Starch with Sucrose on Ruminal Fermentation and Nitrogen Metabolism in Continuous Culture
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2004; 87(12): 4221 - 4229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. G. P. Bowman, B. F. Sowell, L. M. M. Surber, and T. K. Daniels
Nonstructural carbohydrate supplementation of yearling heifers and range beef cows
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2724 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. B. Hall
Short Communication: Effect of Carbohydrate Fermentation Rate on Estimates of Mass Fermented and Milk Response
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1455 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. C. Titgemeyer, J. S. Drouillard, R. H. Greenwood, J. W. Ringler, D. J. Bindel, R. D. Hunter, and T. Nutsch
Effect of forage quality on digestion and performance responses of cattle to supplementation with cooked molasses blocks
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. N. Hristov and J. K. Ropp
Effect of Dietary Carbohydrate Composition and Availability on Utilization of Ruminal Ammonia Nitrogen for Milk Protein Synthesis in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(7): 2416 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. R. Aschenbach, S. K. Bhatia, H. Pfannkuche, and G. Gabel
Glucose Is Absorbed in a Sodium-Dependent Manner from Forestomach Contents of Sheep
J. Nutr., November 1, 2000; 130(11): 2797 - 2801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Animal Science.