Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 9 2221-2234, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs

C. Hicks, A. P. Schinckel, J. C. Forrest, J. T. Akridge, J. R. Wagner and W. Chen
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Carcass and live measurements of 165 market hogs that represented seven genotypes were used to investigate genotype and sex biases associated with the prediction of fat-free lean mass (FFLM) and carcass value. Carcass value was determined as the sum of the product of weight of individual cuts and their average unit prices adjusted for slaughter and processing costs. Independent variables used in the prediction equations included carcass measurements, such as optical probe, midline ruler, ribbed carcass measurements, and electromagnetic scanning (EMSCAN), and live animal ultrasonic scanning. The effect of including subpopulation mean values of independent variables in the prediction equations for FFLM and carcass value was also investigated. Genotype and sex biases were found in equations in which midline backfat, ribbed carcass, EMSCAN, and live ultrasonic scanning were used as single technology sets of measurements. The prediction equations generally undervalued genotypes with above-average carcass value. Biases were reduced when measurements of combined technologies and mean adjusted variables were used. The FFLM and carcass value of gilts were underestimated, and they were overestimated of barrows. Equations that combined OP and EMSCAN technologies were the most accurate and least biased for both FFLM and carcass value. Equations that included carcass weight and midline last-rib backfat thickness measurements were the least accurate and most biased. Genotype and sex biases must be considered when predicting FFLM and carcass value.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Schinckel, M. E. Einstein, K. Foster, and B. A. Craig Evaluation of the impact of errors in the measurement of backfat depth on the prediction of fat-free lean mass J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2031 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. K. Johnson, E. P. Berg, R. Goodwin, J. W. Mabry, R. K. Miller, O. W. Robison, H. Sellers, and M. D. Tokach Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2428 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. M. de Lange, P. C. H. Morel, and S. H. Birkett Modeling chemical and physical body composition of the growing pig J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E159 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Schinckel, C. T. Herr, B. T. Richert, J. C. Forrest, and M. E. Einstein Ractopamine treatment biases in the prediction of pork carcass composition J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 16 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Chen, T. J. Baas, J. W. Mabry, J. C. M. Dekkers, and K. J. Koehler Genetic parameters and trends for lean growth rate and its components in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2062 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]