J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanga, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanga, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 8 2040-2047, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors contributing to the incidence of dark cutting beef

J. A. Scanga, K. E. Belk, J. D. Tatum, T. Grandin and G. C. Smith
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171, USA.

The 1995 National Beef Quality Audit reported that dark cutting beef (dark cutters) cost $6.08 per animal harvested in the United States. Feedlot data were obtained over a 3-yr period from nine commercial feedyards (15,439 pens of cattle; 2,672,223 total cattle). Feedyard, sex, implant treatment, days from final implant to harvest, maximum and minimum daily temperatures, and temperature fluctuations from 2 d before harvest to the day of harvest all contributed (P < .05) to the incidence of dark cutters. Heifers yielded a higher (P < .05) percentage of dark cutters per pen and, when reimplanted a second time with an estrogenic implant, produced greater (P < .05) mean percentages of dark cutters per pen than heifers reimplanted with either androgens or combination (androgen and estrogen) growth promotants. Furthermore, heifers produced higher (P < .05) mean percentages of dark cutters per pen than steers during periods of hot (> 35 degrees C) weather 2 to 1 d before harvest. Steers, when treated with a combination (androgen and estrogen) implant when entering the feedyard and as a reimplant, produced higher (P < .05) mean percentages of dark cutters per pen when compared to other moderate growth-promoting implant strategies. When producers opted to implant steers with estrogenic growth promotants, either as the cattle entered the feedlot or as a final reimplant before harvest, the occurrence of dark cutters was reduced from 9.2 per thousand cattle shipped to 2.0 and .5 per thousand cattle shipped, respectively. Producers that reimplanted heifers before harvest with products that were not primarily estrogenic reduced the occurrence of dark cutters from 10.4/1,000 cattle shipped to 5.2/1,000 cattle shipped when androgen-based growth promotants were used and to 3.5/1,000 cattle shipped when combination (androgen and estrogen) implants were administered. In addition to implant selection, those producers that held cattle on-feed over 100 d past reimplantation reduced the incidence of dark cutters per pen by an average of 38% among heifers and 69% among steers. By reducing the occurrence of dark cutters, there is an opportunity for beef producers to realize large economic savings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Faucitano, P. Y. Chouinard, J. Fortin, I. B. Mandell, C. Lafreniere, C. L. Girard, and R. Berthiaume
Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1678 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. K. Gill, D. L. VanOverbeke, B. Depenbusch, J. S. Drouillard, and A. DiCostanzo
Impact of beef cattle diets containing corn or sorghum distillers grains on beef color, fatty acid profiles, and sensory attributes
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 923 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. W. Beckman, R. M. Enns, S. E. Speidel, B. W. Brigham, and D. J. Garrick
Maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 650 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Berthiaume, I. Mandell, L. Faucitano, and C. Lafreniere
Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2168 - 2177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Mounier, H. Dubroeucq, S. Andanson, and I. Veissier
Variations in meat pH of beef bulls in relation to conditions of transfer to slaughter and previous history of the animals
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1567 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. K. Apple, E. B. Kegley, D. L. Galloway, T. J. Wistuba, and L. K. Rakes
Duration of restraint and isolation stress as a model to study the dark-cutting condition in cattle
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 1202 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Scheffler, D. D. Buskirk, S. R. Rust, J. D. Cowley, and M. E. Doumit
Effect of repeated administration of combination trenbolone acetate and estradiol implants on growth, carcass traits, and beef quality of long-fed Holstein steers
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2395 - 2400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. J. Platter, J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith
Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 984 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.