J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appel, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lundeheim, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appel, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lundeheim, N.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 7 1794-1802, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adjusting for missing data due to culling before testing in genetic evaluations of swine

L. J. Appel, E. Strandberg, B. Danell and N. Lundeheim
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

The aim of this study was to evaluate data augmentation in genetic evaluations as a method of adjusting for missing data due to culling of pigs before testing. A stochastic simulation was used to generate 10 yr of data for age at test (AGE) and fat thickness (FAT) in a breeding unit with 100 sows and 15 boars. Culling was performed at random (C-RAND), within litters (C-W/IN) or over litters (C-OVER), by deleting two-thirds of the records from the simulated data sets. The culling variate (CVAR) used had genetic and phenotypic correlations of 1.00, .75, .50, and .25 with AGE [r(CVAR, AGE)], whereas culling was uncorrelated with AGE in C-RAND. Missing records for AGE were replaced with their expectations (dummy records), based on the phenotypic average of the tested animals and selection intensities applied. With missing records, predictions were seriously biased for AGE in C-W/IN and especially in C-OVER, when r(CVAR, AGE) exceeded .50 and .25, respectively. The ranking of the animals was more affected in C-OVER than in C-W/IN. With dummy records, bias was removed effectively in cases with a high r(CVAR, AGE) in C-W/IN and C-OVER, whereas a larger bias was created in the opposite direction when r(CVAR, AGE) was less than .50 and for C-RAND. In conclusion, this method was beneficial for adjusting missing data owing to culling, when the correlation between CVAR and AGE was .50 or greater.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.