J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Revell, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Smits, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Revell, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Smits, R. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 7 1738-1743, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Body composition at farrowing and nutrition during lactation affect the performance of primiparous sows: II. Milk composition, milk yield, and pig growth

D. K. Revell, I. H. Williams, B. P. Mullan, J. L. Ranford and R. J. Smits
Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands.

Sows that were either fat or lean at farrowing (340 or 280 g of body fat/kg BW, respectively) were offered either a low-protein (LP; 7.9% CP and 15.5 MJ DE/kg as fed) or a high-protein (HP; 19.0% CP and 15.6 MJ DE/kg as fed) diet on an ad libitum basis throughout a 4-wk lactation to test the hypothesis that the amount of milk and its composition are responsive to the supply of endogenous (body reserves) and exogenous (diet) substrates. Pigs were weighed at birth and weekly during lactation, milk yield was estimated using deuterium oxide in early (d 4 to 8) and late lactation (d 24 to 28), and milk samples were collected to determine composition in early (d 4 to 6) and late lactation (d 25 to 27). Throughout lactation, milk yield and composition were mainly associated with differences in litter size. Milk yield was about 15% higher in lean than in fat sows and in sows fed HP rather than LP, but large CV (17 to 32%) prevented these differences from attaining significance (P > .273). The responses in milk yield were reflected in pig growth. Differences in milk composition between treatment groups were not significant; however, during early lactation there was a tendency for fat sows to produce milk with a fat content 21% higher, and a protein content 12% lower, than that of lean sows. Changes in the protein:energy ratio of milk during the course of lactation and small changes in milk yield composition collectively suggested that in early lactation, sow body composition affected milk production but, as lactation progressed, the dietary supply of precursors for milk synthesis became more important.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Bergsma, E. Kanis, M. W. A. Verstegen, and E. F. Knol
Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1067 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
X. Guan, J. E. Pettigrew, P. K. Ku, N. K. Ames, B. J. Bequette, and N. L. Trottier
Dietary protein concentration affects plasma arteriovenous difference of amino acids across the porcine mammary gland
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 2953 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. A. Mejia-Guadarrama, A. Pasquier, J. Y. Dourmad, A. Prunier, and H. Quesnel
Protein (lysine) restriction in primiparous lactating sows: Effects on metabolic state, somatotropic axis, and reproductive performance after weaning
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3286 - 3300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.