|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 5 1469-1480, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
M. J. Traxler, D. G. Fox, P. J. Van Soest, A. N. Pell, C. E. Lascano, D. P. Lanna, J. E. Moore, R. P. Lana, M. Velez and A. Flores
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
We used chemical composition and in vitro digestibility data from temperate and tropical forages to develop relationships between indices of lignification and forage indigestible NDF. Neutral detergent fiber indigestibility increased nonlinearly as the lignin concentration of the NDF increased. Differences in estimated indigestible NDF using equations developed for a specific forage class (C3 and C4 grasses and legumes) were small and are probably not biologically significant when compared to those estimated from a common equation. Selected equations were compared with the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) for the prediction of ADG. The linear equation (2.4 times NDF lignin content) used by the CNCPS and the Beef NRC had some of the largest errors due to mean bias. A log-log model [4.37 x (lignin/NDF)(.84)] provided the best combination of low total prediction error, low mean bias, and minimal error due to regression bias when permanganate lignin was used. A similar equation based on sulfuric acid lignin [6.17 x (lignin/NDF)(.77)] also met the above criteria. These equations then were evaluated with the CNCPS model against animal growth data from diets ranging in forage quality. Regardless of the equation used for predicting unavailable fiber, the CNCPS underpredicted daily gain, with mean biases ranging from -.10 to -.22 kg/d. Regression bias ranged from .13 to .14 kg/d and the coefficients differed from unity (P = .0001). The new equations gave numerically lower energy allowable ADG by steers compared to the linear equation currently used by the CNCPS model. The estimates were lower due to a higher predicted indigestible NDF, which resulted in a lower estimated forage energy value.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Oliver, J. F. Pedersen, R. J. Grant, and T. J. Klopfenstein Comparative Effects of the Sorghum bmr-6 and bmr-12 Genes: I. Forage Sorghum Yield and Quality Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2234 - 2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Puchala, B. R. Min, A. L. Goetsch, and T. Sahlu The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 182 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cannas, L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, A. N. Pell, and P. J. Van Soest A mechanistic model for predicting the nutrient requirements and feed biological values for sheep J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 149 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Caballero, C. Alzueta, L. T. Ortiz, M. L. Rodriguez, C. Barro, and A. Rebole Carbohydrate and Protein Fractions of Fresh and Dried Common Vetch at Three Maturity Stages Agron. J., September 1, 2001; 93(5): 1006 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |